Alex Jones true eye colour is brown – which isn’t surprising because his true identity is the comedian Bill Hicks, as I have amply documented.
Alex Jones usually wears blue contact lenses as part of his masquerade, but he has often been caught in photos without them and showing his normal brown eyes.
The significance of this is deadly because it exposes Alex Jones’ alleged “childhood” photos as photoshop frauds – they depict a boy with blue eyes.
Alex Jones/Bill Hicks hired graphic artists to fabricate childhood photos of himself, making boyhood images that resemble his post-operative persona.
So Hicks/Jones knows all about news media fakery – he employs it himself!!
Yet Hicks/Jones elaborately pretends that all the media hoaxes based on fakery are true events – and he even attacks those who expose the fakery!!
This hypocrisy and dishonesty exposes his true motives: Hicks/Jones is a deceiver. He should never be trusted or believed.
Alex Jones is doing exactly what he’s suppose to do, he acts fearful of the TRUTH as a cue that we must do likewise. Supposedly Jones has been victimized by Megyn Kelly because she falsely accused him of reporting the fact that nobody died at Sandy Hook and that whole thing was a hoax.
Alex Jones is really Bill Hicks and works for the MSM.
His job is to reinforce fake media narratives – he acts as if hoaxes were real events.
Alex Jones claims Sandy Hook and Orlando were genuine mass shootings – keeping people in the dark!!
Dr Steven Pieczenik – who actually admits that these events are media-government hoaxes – continues to support Jones even though he reveals once again (5:20) that Jones is really Bill Hicks!!
This is what Bill Hicks looked like at around 19 years of age about when he started doing stand up comedy:
And this, according to what Alex Jones recently tweeted , are allegedly pictures taken of him at 19 years of age:
Clearly Jones was NOT 19 years old in these photos – he was actually 32.
Look at them side-by-side:
Alex Jones is what Bill Hicks looks like after some radical face surgery. Bill was born with a lumpy face that made him look older and gave a plastic quality that could really alter his look depending on his facial expression and weight. In some photos Hicks’ face looks perfectly normal, but in others he looks strangely bulbous and almost like a mongoloid.
Other people with faces like that include Tony Blair and Renee Zellweger. Her strange face would look beautiful one moment and suddenly change into something hideous the next:
Apparently Renee Zellweger got tired of being mocked and eventually decided to have her lumpy face changed through plastic surgery. She changed her signature deep-set eyes to wide-open and lowered her arching eyebrows to a flat line – and thus became totally unrecognisable:
She might as well change her name – she looks like a completely different person. They went too far and ruined her career. She now looks like just any other generic “pretty face” and lost that unique character that had become famous.
That’s what they intentionally set out to do to Bill Hicks – and they had a lot of possibility for a totally new look because his face was so lumpy and pasty to being with. By tightening it up and reshaping – especially the eyes – they made “Alex Jones” not only look somewhat younger but also like an entirely different person.
But this isn’t a simple re-branding of a washed-up celebrity, Jones/Hicks added to their deception the addition of fake childhood photos ala Sandy Hook style – showing us that his charade is part of a deep-state strategy to deceive patriotic Americans by pretending to be one of us.
The “Irrefutable Proof Alex Jones is Bill Hicks” video is the work of a couple of spaced-out wackos who claim they are channelling spirit-messages – and they assert the bogus claim (which apparently originated with “Russianvids“) – that there was a real Alex Jones at one time, but he inexplicably got replaced by ‘agent’ Bill Hicks in 1997.
This clever disinformation tactic is designed to bolster the legitimacy of the Alex Jones by removing from discussion the most damning evidence against him: his non-existent and faked childhood.
If Bill Hicks in 1997 replaced an alleged real Alex Jones who was born in 1974 – then inquiry into the life of Jones before 1997 is irrelevant. That is a very convenient diversion. However, there is no such Alex Jones born in 1974 – and when Infowars’ attempted to manufacture such a child, and they failed miserably.
If they can get people to simply ignore the childhood issue – by claiming a “real” Alex Jones existed before he was replaced – they have eliminated the thorny issue of dealing with Jones’ fictitious childhood.
The graphic artist probably used to create a series of faked childhood photoshops depicting the fictitious childhood of “Alex Jones” was Michael McWhirter since they all seem to originate from his Flckr account (Areocitizen).
But McWhirter/Infowars made some serious mistakes faking up the childhood of “Alex Jones” – such as misspelling “Emerick” on the birth registry, putting out kid photos with both blue eyes and hazel eyes, inserting too many inside jokes, making fake school yearbook photos, and botching up other photoshops.
The goofy ‘Jones replacement theory’ pushed by the fake truthers is meant to hide the non-existent childhood of Jones and to cover-up all the embarrassing photoshop errors.
The fact that Infowars, Texas Monthly, the Onion, and Mark Dice have themselves all linked to the “Irrefutable Proof” video is proof enough that it was created as disinformation. It is a tainted effort at exposing the Bill Hicks/Alex Jones fraud by a couple of obviously deranged wackos. Undoubtedly the bad guys hope that it is crazy enough to discredit the truth in the eyes of many people, buying Hicks/Jones more time to continue his charade.
An article by “Dan Solomon” of Texas Monthly reports on the speculation that Alex Jones is Bill Hicks without delving into any of the facts.
News media publications probably have many authors like “Dan Solomon” who are actually ghost writers, the name being a company “brand” that is owned by the newspaper/magazine to which are ascribed articles written by stay at home “journalists” writing on pay-per-piece basis. Or it could be that the “Dan Solomon” brand is a ghost-writing name farmed out to others through a separate media company entirely – produced in-house and then bid out to various journals. The exact inner workings of these arrangements would be impossible to determine because these things are closely guarded trade secrets.
Nevertheless, whoever the “Dan” person was who authored the article, he/she did a miserable job. Here are some of the things he did not consider or do before writing his article on Alex Jones being Bill Hicks:
1. He didn’t provide a list of the evidence at issue.
2. He didn’t take the photos of their matching teeth to a dentist to obtain a professional opinion on how identical they are.
3. He didn’t take the matching facial dimensions and matching profile shape to a forensic detective for an expert opinion on the likelihood of match.
4. He didn’t consult a plastic surgeon and the feasibility of altering Hicks’ face into Alex’ face.
5. He didn’t report on any inquiries he made into the Texas or FBI witness protection program – even if the reply would have been “no comment.”
6. He didn’t report on the extent of Kevin Booth’s association with Hicks/Jones or call him to get an explanation for why he listed both men as his “producer” for a 2013 film.
7. He didn’t obtain an actual birth certificate for Jones (not just a computer print-out), nor a death certificate for Bill Hicks (which are sealed in Arkansas for 50 years).
8. He didn’t interview anybody present when Hicks died, nor any of Jones childhood friends.
9. He didn’t try to obtain school records for Alex Jones.
10. He didn’t report on the photoshop anomalies put out by Alex Jones of himself as a child with different colour eyes or the fake yearbook photo.
11. He didn’t report on Jones’ constantly changing hair colour, his shaved eyebrows, his changing eye-colours.
12. He didn’t locate any of those suspicious of Alex Jones’ identity and ask them to explain their theories.
13. He didn’t report on Jones’ own admission of having family in the CIA, nor Hicks’ connection to Dr Frank Gannon, the confidant of Richard Nixon.
14. He didn’t analyse the numerous occasions Alex Jones confessed being Bill Hicks – and evaluate their sincerity.
15. He didn’t contact Alex Jones with the accusation and quote what sort of response was given.
16. He didn’t ask Kevin Booth to explain overlapping ownership interests of Bill Hicks/Alex Jones in Sacred Cow Productions, or why he made the strange choice of adopting Jones as Hicks replacement.
17. He didn’t investigate Hicks’ liberal fan-club’s on-going claims that he still “lives” – nor why they would celebrate a “right-winger” like Alex Jones.
18. He didn’t try to obtain copies of the video where Jerome Corsi called Alex Jones “Bill” nor contact Corsi for an explanation.
19. He didn’t anonymously ask around in Hicks’ comic subculture to see what sort of responses he would get.
20. He didn’t comment on the apparent age of Alex Jones who looks 12 or 13 years older than his stated age.
21. He didn’t question whether Jones’ absurd stage persona and gruff voice and stiff mannerism are all an act.
21. He didn’t delve into the TimeWarner connection to Austin Cable Access – investigating the connections Hicks/Jones has to major media.
22. He didn’t question that plausibility of the success obtained by a community college drop out who was nothing but a local cable access gadfly. Who helped him? Who financed him? Who trained him? Who supplied him with connections? Who built his organization?
23. He didn’t report on the oddity of a young man like Hicks dying of an old man’s disease like pancreatic cancer – nor did he ask a cancer expert to comment on the plausibility of Hicks doing stand-up comedy in November 1993 with a full head of hair despite 6 months of chemotherapy.
24. He didn’t inquire into Hicks’ medical care – why doctor “William Donovan” let Hicks die at home instead of getting treatment in a hospital.
25. Didn’t contact reporters who left infowars, people who have been harassed by a paranoid Alex Jones about ‘disclosing secrets’ – and who have spoken of being afraid for their lives because of him.
The so-called journalist “Dan Solomon” did none of the basic investigative work necessary when it came time to write the article about Alex Jones being Bill Hicks. The article he wrote instead was written by a hack who is only good at shovelling out entertaining little diddies of news-media propaganda – it is not the work of a real journalist.
“Dan” was so eager to repeat the masonic “33” in his article that he wrongly reported it as being Hick’s age at death – an error the UK Parliament repeated in their commemorations. The video ‘irrefutable proof’ is also 33 minutes long – showing that everybody in this stunt is doing the Masonic wink-wink to each other about what is really going on. (It’s considered of huge significance to Freemasons that Hiram king of Tyre helped king Solomon build the Temple by providing him with a mischling from the tribe of Dan to be the chief artificer.)
It is rather unsurprising that the name “Dan Solomon” is also farmed out to the Onion on occasion – showing that the Texas Monthly report was part of a coordinated cover-up, a drive-by scorn-throw lamely attempting to bury the inconvenient truth about Alex Jones being Bill Hicks – a fact that is becoming increasingly difficult to hide.
Narration video: https://archive.org/details/HicksPhotoshop0007
Alex Jones’ beginning? Alex Jones’ career did not spontaneously begin on his own initiative with an Austin talk radio and local cable access program, as he has alleged.
Sacred Cow Productions
Bill Hicks’ career was stalled in stand-up and he began trying to take new career directions – including ‘ conspiracy ‘ theories. At the time of Hicks alleged death he was ranting about the Waco massacre conspiracy. Read the rest of this entry »