The word “dote” appears 7 times in the Holy Bible: six times in Ezekiel chapter 23, and once in Jeremiah:
“A sword is upon the liars; and they shall dote: a sword is upon her mighty men; and they shall be dismayed”
Jeremiah is describing the fall of Babylon which is the USA.
The word “dote” means to have the intellect impaired by age, or to be delirious with passion. Combined with “upon” it means to regard with excessive fondness. “Dotard” is the old mentally impaired man – variant, “doter” – also, one who dotes upon something. It seems the meanings are related in that a man excessively fond of something is on that account made weak and mentally infirm. Apparently it is related to the French word redotar – to ramble on childishly – and a similar old Dutch word meaning silly.
The sword of the Lord is upon the lying USA dotards – feeble effeminate men with silly minds, indulgent upon trifles, rambling, weak, and delirious.
How did it end up like this?
“The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nations that forget God.”
Races don’t want to live together in America. People of all races have chosen to live in areas that are filled with similar people – forming balkanized communities that are race-specific. People’s own discriminatory choices should be legalized.
There is a housing crisis in America. Many people can’t afford to buy homes and there are huge numbers homeless. And there are slums filled with criminals and ne’er-do-wells who live on the government’s dime. This situation makes absolutely no sense.
Homes in America ought to be abundant and cheap.
- Huge amount of undeveloped rural land.
- Land in cities is 15% vacant.
With all that excess land homes should be cheap – but that isn’t happening.
As for rural land, much of it is blocked from development by the government, and much of the rest lack amenities that would attract people to live there.
To create a nice place to live you have to exclude bad people. You have to prevent blacks, hispanics, and other undesirable minorities from moving into the area because they bring crime, drugs, and gangs. Nobody is allowed to do that. It only takes one black moving in to destroy a neighbourhood by scaring away normal people.
The only way to restrict blacks is to raise the prices beyond what they can afford. These expensive areas are free from niggers and that is where everybody wants to live.
White can afford to buy relatively cheap homes in ghetto areas filled with blacks and hispanics, but they must live in squalor and get targetted for crime and abuse.
If white-only housing was allowed, mid and low-priced developments could be built and even modest neighbourhoods would be considered prestigious, safe, and attractive. If race-restricted development was allowed, vacant land in cities and rural areas could both become worthwhile for homebuilding once again.
Negroes that move into areas are unwanted – they bring problems and cause distress to the existing residents. This is unfair. Therefore government should require blacks to live in designated areas only. (They may have to pay a premium to find limited space within those boundaries, but that is too bad. This would be an example of “equality” – whites always had to pay a premium to escape them, and now they have to pay a premium to escape from whites.)
Increasing housing stock with race-specific housing developments will allow whites to form great neighbourhoods without having to worry about race problems. Whites will have an escape from being forced to live with ethnics.
Of course, this is never going to happen. America has morphed into a race-less, religion-less, morality-free nation with no racial identity – simply a “civic nation” where the only thing that matters is that nothing matters. America is mystery Babylon, with all that entails.
When he was questioned about the Supreme Court’s newly invented “sodomite marriage” the judge called it:
“absolutely settled law…. [but] there is ongoing litigation about its impact and its application right now.”
That’s a ridiculous answer and totally unacceptable.
Judge Scalia’s dissenting opinion called that decision a “judicial putsch” – that is to say, a completely illegitimate power-grab. A handful of lawyers in black robes invented an abominable fake federal “marriage” between sodomites that has never existed in legal history and which the US Constitution certainly didn’t empower the federal government to invent by itself and impose upon the states. It’s an absolutely insane decision that obviously needs to be reversed ASAP.
If the judge had merely called it “a precedent” then he’d be making a little wiggle room for himself – acknowledging it as a case decided by the Supreme Court and perhaps nothing more. But to call it “absolutely settled law” is completely beyond the pale.
He also views “precedent” as supporting liberal cases and won’t reverse them:
“What was once a hotly-contested issue is no longer a hotly-contested issue. We move forward.”
This is wrong and betrays his flawed thinking.
Because the Legislative branch of government passes new laws all the time, it’s most recent law book is its authority; but in the Judicial branch it is very different: its most authoritative principles – called “precedent” – are those oldest decisions that have stood the test of time.
The word ‘precedent’ has been distorted by modern activist judges to mean their latest liberal decisions that actually fly in the face of all historic precedent. Their novel decisions they presumptuously label as ‘precedent’ so they can fool the suckers into thinking that they have the weight of history and deserve respect, even though they don’t !
Christiannews had already reported that Gorsuch is actually pro-fag-marriage, and he even *attends a liberal Episcopalian pro-fag “church” led by a woman “priestess” who also supports fag-marriage:
Joshua Goodbaum served as a clerk for Gorsuch in 2009, and now works as an attorney. He told Reuters on Friday that on the week of his 2014 “wedding” with his partner, Gorsuch expressed his support. “He said, ‘This is a wonderful thing. You’ll see how your relationship grows,’” Goodbaum recalled. “I have never felt the least whiff from him of homophobia or intolerance toward gay people,” he added.
As previously reported, Gorsuch is an Episcopalian, and attends St. John’s Episcopal Church in Boulder, Colorado. St. John’s identifies itself as “inclusive” on its website and is led by female minister Susan Springer. All of its deacons are also female.
In 2013 Springer expressed her support for same-sex “marriage.” “I don’t think anybody in my faith tradition is out to destroy marriage between a man and a woman,” she told the Daily Camera. “I think we are out to find a way to offer the same blessing and the same sense of inclusion to same-sex couples. And I think we stand as prophetic witness, that same-sex couples ought to enjoy the same legal benefits, if you will, as heterosexual couples.”
Barf. This idiot judge’s apostate “church” is a woman-led fag-coven.
When asked about whether he accepts Roe v. Wade‘s de-humanizing of unborn children, judge Gorsucks replied,
“I accept the law of the land, senator, yes,”
He’s not even attempting to be evasive here – he comes right out and makes it plain that he supports Roe v. Wade.
When asked what he would have done if Donald Trump had asked him to promise to overturn Roe, he said:
“No … I would have walked out the door!”
The judge has no problem with corporations being “people” but an unborn baby is not a “person” and he believes that so strongly about that he would have turned down the nomination if it required him to reverse Roe.
Gorsuch looked good on paper, but in reality he truly sucks.
I wonder if Trump can find an excuse to pull his appointment?
A good strategy would be for the Republican Senate to let Schummer’s filibuster to stand without going ‘nuclear’ against it yet – and that way just let the Gorsuch clown get rejected. That way when he’s dumped, the democrats get all the blame.
Then he can appoint Judge Roy Moore next time and go nuclear. (Or appoint somebody like Paul Ryan just to get him out of the way).
*UPDATE: More lies, this Gorsuch guy isn’t even a Protestant – he’s only been attending Episcopal church since 2002 because of his Anglican wife, but in reality he has always been a Roman Catholic!
The expanding earth theory is the very convincing idea that the globe has expanded dramatically over time. Sea floor maps are conclusive evidence that this theory is true. Here is a diagram on which I’ve drawn where the cracks seem likely to continue should the earth begin to re-expand once again:
Most of the red zones are in the middle of the ocean and continued expanding in those areas wouldn’t affect the land – other than great waves forming (a prophesy that Jesus said would happen). But in some places the red zone runs right into a land mass.
For example, the red zones in the Indian Ocean run right into the Arabian peninsula. This would indicate that area is poised to crack in two. That matches with a giant split in the earth at Jerusalem that is prophesied in the Bible – with half the Mount of Olives going north and half going south and an east-west valley opening up into which the Jews flee into the the desert for safety from Gog.
The other place where red zones run into land are at the Gulf of Mexico. The other red area is way up in the Arctic. If those two areas were to join up in a giant crack, it would destroy the United States of America.
That is exactly what is predicted in the Bible regarding the fall of Babylon in a giant earthquake.