Israel the next California?

P1020798When I visited Israel I was amazed how similar it seems to California. The sunny weather, the sandy beaches, and imported eucalyptus trees everywhere. It is multicultural just like California – the biggest minority is the Arabs, sort of like great numbers of Mexicans in California. Tel Aviv is like San Diego, Haifa is like San Francisco, and the Dead Sea like the Mojave desert. Going up to Jerusalem is sort of like hills of La Canada, Chino Hills, or Santa Clarita. Regional comparisons would match Mexico with Egypt, Arizona with Trans-Jordan, and Texas with Iraq. Visiting Galilee is like the Colorado River, and the Golan is like Napa and the wine country.


Maybe, after Islam is irradiated and America take a nose dive (Jeremiah 50-51 and Revelation 17-18), many people will leave the USA and return to Israel along with the Jews, and together they will repopulate that entire region transforming it into a new California during the millennium?


Enlarge the place of thy tent, and let them stretch forth the curtains of thine habitations: spare not, lengthen thy cords, and strengthen thy stakes; For thou shalt break forth on the right hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the Gentiles, and make the desolate cities to be inhabited.” (Isaiah 54:2-3)

P1020770” For the LORD will have mercy on Jacob, and will yet choose Israel, and set them in their own land: and the strangers shall be joined with them, and they shall cleave to the house of Jacob. And the people shall take them, and bring them to their place: and the house of Israel shall possess them in the land of the LORD for servants and handmaids: and they shall take them captives, whose captives they were; and they shall rule over their oppressors.” (Isaiah 14:1-2)

P1040079” And I will multiply men upon you, all the house of Israel, even all of it: and the cities shall be inhabited, and the wastes shall be builded: And I will multiply upon you man and beast; and they shall increase and bring fruit: and I will settle you after your old estates, and will do better unto you than at your beginnings: and ye shall know that I am the LORD. Yea, I will cause men to walk upon you, even my people Israel; and they shall possess thee, and thou shalt be their inheritance, and thou shalt no more henceforth bereave them of men.” (Ezekiel 36:10-12)

P1040085” ¶ And it shall come to pass, that ye shall divide it by lot for an inheritance unto you, and to the strangers that sojourn among you, which shall beget children among you: and they shall be unto you as born in the country among the children of Israel; they shall have inheritance with you among the tribes of Israel. And it shall come to pass, that in what tribe the stranger sojourneth, there shall ye give him his inheritance, saith the Lord GOD.” (Ezekiel 47:22-23)

There are no Communist or Left-Wing extremists says UK Government

extremeThe ‘conservative’ UK government has put out a bizarre policy memo called “Counter-Extremism” that contends that right-wing white folks exercising their free speech on the internet are actually a grave danger and that it must be her majesty’s government officially policy to disrupt and oppose them.

The Home Office policy paper equates the harmless espousing of traditional Christian and white values – called “hate” – with the actual deadly threat of Islamic violence – while completely ignoring the dangers posed by radical left-wing groups, such as communists, anarchists, socialists, Marxists, the IRA, black rioters, radicalised feminists, crazed sodomite activists, rent-a-mob anti-fascists, animal rights fanatics, minority race baiters, angry environmentalists, and so forth.

The Home Secretary’s policy paper – endorsed by prime minister David Cameron – paints the UK as being a country without a particular race, without a particular religion, bereft of traditional values, and where freedom to express one’s opposition to the imposition of a multi-cult regime is not to be tolerated.

Their neo-papal-bull defines nebulous and hypocritical concepts like “equality”, multi-culturalism, “democracy”, and religious indifference as the newly “evolved” fundamental values of Great Britain.

The nation is no longer a Monarchy of white, straight, protestant Christians – it has finally become a “multi-racial, multi-faith democracy” that welcomes all “sexual orientations” – and this is, according to David Cameron, “something extraordinary.”

So the gospel of Jesus Christ is declared to be on a par with the soul-damning religions of Sikhism, Hinduism, Mohammedanism, and Judaism, and the people of Great Britain are to have their gene pool ruined by race-mixing with the low IQ heathens from Asia and Africa. Extraordinary, indeed.

What this policy paper exposes is an extremist danger of the worst sort: a fanatical  government.

The intelligence services manipulated radicalised moslem patsies behind the scenes to engage in acts of state sponsored terrorism, but then the public was told that true Islam really means peace – the real danger comes from any person that disagrees with government policies: every dissident is an “extremist.

Hence it really doesn’t matter how crazy and dangerous you are as long as you acquiesce in the formation of World Government – and this explains why the Home Office couldn’t locate any extremists on the left wing.

Note that the Catholic popes have been employing this same tactic for several years now – welcoming any and every satanic godless religion on earth as long as it agrees to join hands with Rome, while labelling all those who refuse to join with his one-world religion as extremists.

The problem for Christian activists in the UK (and everywhere else) is that they have abandoned the King James Bible as final authority and thereby are left as mealy-mouthed relativists with regard to what the Bible actually says, and they have so surrendered on the issue of race mixing – afraid to oppose it as the ungodly perversion that it is – that they have no footing to oppose the imposition of religious pluralism and of sodomy, the hatred of which gets lumped together into the “bigot” category – a label cowardly Christians run away from in terror.

” Whosoever therefore shall be ashamed of me and of my words in this adulterous and sinful generation; of him also shall the Son of man be ashamed, when he cometh in the glory of his Father with the holy angels.” (Mark 8:38)

(UPDATE: ALABAMA REVOLTS!!) Scotus now applying their fag laws retroactively and without holding a hearing

An unmarried female sex pervert, a dyke, in 2007 persuaded a Georgia family court to let her adopt 3 children, but since this adoption was actually illegal in both George and Alabama at the time, the Alabama Supreme Court wouldn’t let the sexual degenerate use that decree to take custody of the children away from their birth mother in Alabama.

But today the US supreme court summarily reversed the Alabama supreme court’s holding without even scheduling a hearing on the matter!

This means the out-of-control federal tribunal, which has been illegally inventing new “sodomite equality” on its own initiative, is now illegally applying their make-believe decrees retroactively to legitimize the past civil disobedience of sodomite politicians and judges who pushed the faggot agenda by making illegal rulings and refusing to follow the law.

The scotus morons are inventing their own version of state law, and then cynically using the “full faith and credit” provision of the Constitution (which only applies for states to recognize legitimate legal rights that are determined by other states) to force every state to actually obey scotus’ own invented edicts.

Sodomite “equality” is evil enough, but it is especially wicked when the sex pervs are given a legal platform for harming children. The federal court’s high-handed and disrespectful imposition of left-wing decrees highlights how the mask is coming off, lawless left-wing totalitarianism has become the new normal.

Those permitted to sit in high authority, in their submission to even higher heavenly powers, are charged with the duty of praising the well-doers (the only true “rights”) and executing God’s wrath upon evil-doers (including the death penalty for murderers and sodomites)(Romans 1:32 and 13:1-4).

When those in authority no longer perform these necessary functions, but rather do the very opposite in praising evil, making wickedness a “right”, and persecuting those that do good, they are subject to removal from office upon the decree of God.APPEALTOHEAVEN

The expression “Appeal to Heaven” comes from the prayer of those convinced that the existing government should indeed lose its divine mandate. The “Appeal to Heaven” is the stage where a man is no longer convinced that in conscience toward God he must obey the law of the land, but rather, that in conscience to God, who is the highest power, he must resist the intermediate powers that have become hostage by evil.

The “Appeal to Heaven” can only come after a searching look within to judge one’s motive for such a rebellion. No government is perfect. Not all rebellions are justified. We should long tolerate minor problems and wait patiently the fluctuations that return governments to a right footing as administrations change in the course of time.

But when the trajectory has become unrelentingly evil for many years, and the prospects of improvement in the normal course of things far-fetched, it would be wrong not to seek a fundamental change by any means necessary in the rule of government to re-order it according to the mandate of heaven.

Such fundamental changes rarely occur without bloodshed. The “Appeal to Heaven” is a plea for victory by God’s blessing and approval. But governments are deserved – we are corrupt so our government is corrupt because it came from us. Why would the Lord grant to unrepentant Americans the favour of forming a new government when it would – formed also by us – likely be just as bad, or worse, than what we have right now? So we must first clean up the filth in our own midst when we “Appeal to Heaven” if we are to hope for God’s favourable response.

Yes, there is a higher court above scotus – and it’s time we filed our appeal there.

= = =

UPDATE: It begins!

Alabama’s highest court officially nullifies scotus’ illegal “sodomite marriage” ruling, grants dismissal in favour of Liberty Counsel.

Concurring opinion by Judge Moore states correctly: “An act of sexual intimacy between two men or two women, by contrast, was considered “an infamous crime against nature” and a “disgrace to human nature.” 4 William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England. Homosexuals who seek the dignity of marriage must first forsake the sexual habits that disqualify them from admission to that hallowed institution.”

Note, this decision is being wrongly characterized by the lying and stupid news media.

Alabama’s decision (3/4/2016) rejected various left-wing ACLU petitions that sought to have the Alabama supreme court rescind its own early order that prohibited the state’s probate judges from issuing fake marriage license to sodomites. The petitions claimed that on the basis of scotus’ insane Obergefallen opinion the prohibition on queer marraiges had to be lifted. But the Alabama’s Supreme Court refused to recognize Obergefallen and said it is illegitimate, they will “refuse to recognize” it, and therefore it has no effect on Alabama’s laws.

This means Alabama probate judges must refuse to issue sodomite marriages, but they will undoubtedly be ordered once again to do so by the federal courts, setting up an eventual show-down between Alabama’s courts with the federal courts.

Choral Evensong now in HTML5

bbc3Lots of irritating things with BBC3’s Choral Evensong, so I’m not sure why I enjoy it so much.

I am sorely disappointed every time they ruin the service by failing to read from the majestic Authorized Version (King James Bible) – and instead spoil the moment by reading from some goofy new version. And I absolutely can’t stand it when the service is conducted by some hyper-lispy queer (which is even worse on the ears than listening to some hideous Anglican “priestess”). And, admittedly, sometimes the organ music is total garbage – modernistic compositions that are intentionally discordant,  unpleasant, and spooky.

But usually this is not the case, and regardless there is still so much to love.

Mostly the music is divine baroque compositions that are profound and inspiring. The sung psalms are from the wonderful Coverdale version – a clever and authentic version that influenced the King James Bible. And the readings straight from the Anglican Book of Common Prayer are also glorious, intelligent, and timeless.

For any saved Christian there is much to appreciate in these beautiful Choral services – even if the performers of them are, sadly, often today just unsaved religious do-gooders.

Now that the BBC3 website has upgraded to an HTML5 Player, their play-lists of recent Choral Evensong episodes will be more accessible to those of us who have removed the insecure flash-player add-on from our browsers. (If part of the service is irritating, just skip forward a few minutes to the next segment.)

Did Scalia fake his death ??

FR-PAUL-SCALIANobody is wondering whether Scalia didn’t die, but faked his death. Should we be asking that question?

Of course, that’s even more far-fetched an idea than that he was murdered – but perhaps it could it explain some of the oddities?

For example, why would an allegedly devout old-school Roman Catholic want his body to be cremated? Why did his family urge “no autopsy” and get angry at speculation about what happened ? Why such secrecy about the 35 “International Order of St. Hubertus” Catholic cult members who have remained anonymous ? Why did Obama treat the funeral of Scalia as not important?

It might be hard to imagine that Scalia would take a dive, purposely exiting the scene so that everything could collapse – but Scalia is a Roman Catholic – and along with Thomas and Alito a member of the Knights of Columbus – and has to do whatever his religious overlords tell him to do.

Catholic gimmick: “Early Christians”

Roman Catholics have a religious system that doesn’t hold up to the light of the Scriptures, so they are forced to resort to various apologetic gimmicks to fool the suckers.

Since they know that a direct attack against the Bible would be too obvious, they are clever to instead set up rival authorities. Once there are several authorities placed alongside of the Scriptures – they will then solve the uncertainty and contradictions (that they created through the invention of competing authorities) by ensconcing their religious system as the final arbiter, judge, and referee to “decide” what the “correct teaching” really is.

This 1,2, 3 method is a classic Roman Catholic trick. Start with the 1st authority – the Bible, then propose the 2nd authorities, and then have your religion come along #3 to stand among the various authorities picking and choosing whatever teachings suit the religious hierarchy.

The secondary authorities are Church councils, historic traditions, scholarship, the writings of Church Fathers, culture, human reason, corrupt manuscripts, Greek/Hebrew lexicons, visions, private interpretations (where plain meaning of words get re-defined by Rome’s private whim), religious pronouncements, witty sayings of religious celebrities, and so forth.

Of course such a mass of religious literature is going to be hopelessly contradictory – but that does not weaken the Catholic argument – it strengthens it. The more jumbled and diverse the authorities are the more necessary is the religious referee to decide between them. That is why you’ll always find Rome behind the drive to corrupt the scriptures and pollute the world with false Bible versions. The Roman Curia loves the confusion and ambiguities because the laity is confused and that secures its self-appointed role as the problem-solver reconciling all teachings to its own. Thank goodness we have ‘Mother Church’ to tell us what to think!

pope preys on protestants

When somebody objects to their effrontery against the authority of the Holy Scriptures, the Catholic authorities appeal to the so-called “early Christians” who launched this heresy long ago. If the “early Christians” consulted traditions beside the Bible and looked to religious authorities for guidance, then supposedly this legitimises the methodology. After all, those “early Christians” were closer in time to Christ and the Apostles – and this proximity in time allegedly validates their customs.

The “early Christians” that Rome refers to are never the actual early Christians of the first century A.D. as recorded in the Bible to 100 A.D. – they are always those of later centuries: second to seventh+.

The actual “early Christians” from 30 A.D. to 99 A.D. were instructed by Christ’s own Apostles in everything they needed to know for faith and practice, and the Holy Spirit had such instructions recorded for us for all time by the preservation of the New Testament scriptures that the Apostles wrote down.

It is not a surprise that later Christians 100 AD+ began to depart from the scriptural instructions handed down by the true early Christians of the New Testament period – the beginning of such heresy was already testified against by the Apostles while they were alive, and they prophesied that it would only get worse as soon as they were gone. This is exactly what happened.

“For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them. Therefore watch, and remember, that by the space of three years I ceased not to warn every one night and day with tears.” (Acts 20:29-31)

“But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived.” (2 Timothy 3:13)

There was a meeting in Jerusalem where the apostles set out finally and forever that the teaching that all men are saved by the grace of Jesus Christ, not by works: “But we believe that through the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved, even as they.” (Acts 15:11)

That meeting (erroneously called a ‘council’ by today’s theologians) repudiated religious legalism: “certain which went out from us have troubled you with words, subverting your souls, saying, Ye must be circumcised, and keep the law: to whom we gave no such commandment:” (Acts 15:24)

So we see that according the Apostles, the Holy Ghost, and the entire early church assembled, the certain teaching of New Testament Christianity is this: salvation is by the grace of Jesus Christ, and not of works!

That is the end of the matter. Period. All the false teachings that later centuries of Christians adopted contrary to this original teaching are flat out 100% wrong.

For church conduct, they only set forth the following moral guideline to do well: “For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things; That ye abstain from meats offered to idols, and from blood, and from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.” (Acts 15:28-29)

And repeated again, “As touching the Gentiles which believe, we have written and concluded that they observe no such thing, save only that they keep themselves from things offered to idols, and from blood, and from strangled, and from fornication.” (Acts 21:25)

Now notice that those definitive ‘early church’ commandments for Christian teaching and conduct are all violated by Roman Catholicism. They have set up a system of religious legalism that requires human works for salvation, they have erected icons and statues to bow before, they have idolized their priests as “Christs”, they have idolized little sun-shaped wafers as “Christ”, they profess to eat and drink real blood in the host, and they have institutionalized fornication by demanding celibacy of their priests and by prohibiting divorced persons from ever getting re-married.

Thus in every respect the religion of Rome violates the fundamental teachings of New Testament Christianity – yet they will profess uncertainty as to the meaning of the full and final Apostolic commandments in Acts 15 (and elsewhere in the Bible) and pretend instead that clarity comes from the human dribble written after in later centuries by  men that Rome will falsely describe as the “early Christians”!

ADL was founded to protect a perverted Jewish murderer

But ye denied the Holy One and the Just, and desired a murderer to be granted unto you;” (Acts 3:14)

The ADL (“Anti-defamation League“) made headlines recently by trying to order Donald Trump to denounce David Duke, a white politician in Louisiana who was briefly in the KKK 40 years ago.

Many people don’t realize that the ADL was formed to protect the reputation of a rich Jewish murderer named Leo Frank, the chapter president of B’nai B’rith in Atlanta, Georgia. 29 year old Leo Frank was a manager at his rich uncle Moses’s pencil factory when one day he lured a white 13 year old girl named Mary Phagan, one of his unpaid employees, into his basement where he brutally raped, beat, and strangled her to death.

After a thorough investigation the Jew was arrested, tried, convicted by the jury in August 1913, and sentenced to die. The New York B’nai B’rith rushed to defend the murderer, asserting that his conviction was based on Southern “bigotry” etc etc. In October 1913 the B’nai B’rith organization formed the “ADL” as a lobbying /pressure group to save their boy Leo Frank. Nevertheless, Frank’s conviction was upheld despite five appeals to the Georgia Supreme Court and the U.S. Supreme Court.

Yet after two years of unrelenting pressure, the governor of Georgia in June 1915 was finally moved into commuting the Jew’s death sentence to a sentence of life in prison.

But it was not to be. The infuriated public was moved to action. The following month, August 1915, a band of men – many of them leading citizens – kidnapped Frank from the prison, took him to a farm in Marietta, and hung him there by the neck from an oak tree before a crowd of relieved onlookers.

After Leo Frank’s lynching, the ADL monster lived on as a leading player in the victim industry, not only specializing in domestic disinformation and character assassination, but also illegal spying activities against Americans on behalf of foreign governments.

The ADL is a despicable criminal organization that should have been outlawed years ago. They have launched a pathetic attack against Donald Trump for only one reason: they cannot bribe him.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 298 other followers