Article 2 section 1 of the US Constitution states:
“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President”
To be a natural born US citizen under the Constitution you must acquire your citizenship at the time of birth by virtue of two things: from your parent’s citizenship and from being born on US soil (including at military base overseas that is subject to exclusive US jurisdiction).
It is that combination of land and parents that make the natural born citizen special.
Those born in the USA to non-citizens are subject to the jurisdiction of their parent’s nation, just as the children of US citizens born abroad are going to be subject to the interest of the US government. Such children have conflicting citizenship claims – they do not have a sole identity.
Since the US President should be loyal to his own country, not favour any other country, and be entirely free from the jurisdiction of a foreign power, it was determined to make “natural born citizen” a qualification for the office. This also creates a barrier that makes it more difficult for a foreign state to inject a traitor into our midst from abroad who would then run for the presidency.
Donald Trump = born in USA and both of his parents were US citizens at the time of birth. Mother was born in Scotland but became a naturalized US citizen 4 years before Trump was born. Trump is a “natural born citizen” and qualified to be president.
Marco Rubio = born in USA in 1971 but neither one of his parents was a US citizen at that time – there were still Cubans. His parents only became citizens 4 years later. Thus Rubio obtained his citizenship at birth by virtue of location only – he was an “anchor baby”. He is not a “natural born citizen” and is not qualified to be the president.
Raphel “Ted” Cruz = born in Calgary, Canada in 1970 to a Cuban father (who became a Canadian citizen in 1973) and an American mother (born in Delaware – may have also become a Canadian citizen in 1973). Ted Cruz was not born in America, and only one of his parents was a US citizen at the time of his birth. He was born a Canadian. His claim to US citizenship is only his eligibility to petition for it through his mother; however the Cruz family moved to Houston Texas in 1974 and there is no record of any application for Ted Cruz to claim US citizenship. Apparently this was a loose end that was never resolved – the family just went forward as if Ted was a US citizen and nobody ever challenged it. In 2014 Cruz formally renounced his Canadian citizenship – but that doesn’t make him a US citizen. Has he ever renounced his Cuban citizenship? In this mess one thing is abundantly clear – Ted Cruz is not a natural born US citizen. The fact that his citizenship is a messy tug-of-war between Cuba, Canada, and the USA proves the very wisdom that went into making “natural born citizen” a qualification for the presidency.
Although the bible doesn’t explicitly call gambling a sin, we are told as follows:
- “All things are lawful unto me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any.” (1 Corinthians 6:12)
- “All things are lawful for me, but all things are not expedient: all things are lawful for me, but all things edify not. Let no man seek his own, but every man another’s wealth.” (1 Corinthians 10:23-24)
Thus technically “lawful” things – things not specifically called sins – should nevertheless be avoided by Christians if they are nevertheless inexpedient, unedifying, addictive, or selfish. This guidance clearly makes involvement with gambling improper.
For further consideration:
Here’s how a godly gentleman protested with respect inside a church in England. He did it in a very polite but firm manner that caused no alarm or disturbance and he left immediately upon request. Also, he acted as a minister who was going to his own countrymen in the state church and admonishing fellow Christians from the Bible regarding their improper conduct in ordaining women bishops. (start at 14:40)
This differs greatly from those allegedly converted ex-Moslems who invaded a Catholic church in Nevada and screamed at the people to repent of idolatry and get saved. In that instance there is no common ground that would make their unseemly protest at all legitimate. The ex-Moslems are perhaps misguided, but I would suspect they are probably provacatuers with questionable motives. It is not brave or honourable to go into any quiet meeting and frighten unsaved people. Roman Catholics are also misguided, but they deserve to be left peace and quiet without harassment and insult – especially during their religious services. That is the actions of an idiotic bully.
In contrast, Rev Stephen Holland was talking to his own protestant believers with a brief but intelligent plea timed to occur during a lull in the service when it would cause the least amount of disturbance or alarm. It took a considerable amount of poise and bravery -and he deserves to be commended; whilst the “ex-moslems” deserve to be condemned.
The phoney “ex” Moslems made people angry by their methods such that their message was not even heard. Holland probably made people angry because of his message – despite his respectful method. That’s the difference.
This is rather speculative – but what the hey – something interesting has popped worth mentioning. The boy in the Bill Hicks’ family photo above looks like it might be his nephew or other relative. He has large ears, nostrils visible from the front, brown eyes, and a prominent forehead like the gentleman behind him – perhaps his uncle or father – Bill’s brother. He shares the Hicks family’ protruding bottom lip that Alex had reduced by plastic surgery. He might have grown up to look a lot like Infowar’s reporter/producer Rob Jacobson – is he the same person? One feature they share is the Dumbo ears – Jacobson’s ears also stick out horribly, just like the kid’s ears.
Alex Jones would have to employ people who will keep his secret – who better than his own nephew? Jones employed another family member, his step sister Marley.
Truth of the matter is that Rob Jacobson isn’t that great of a reporter – in fact he’s awful. He mumbles and has no presence and doesn’t give interesting reports. He seems to be rather useless actually. Why did Alex hire somebody that goofy? Was it because he is in the family?Alex seems rather informal around him – grabbing him, interrupting him, and even referring to one of his very early Austin cable interviews that suggesst Jacobson has been familiar with Jones’ work since the onset – how could that be?
I couldn’t find any info on who this Rob Jacobson is or where he came from besides his work for Infowars. Is he really Bill Hicks’ nephew from the photo? Probably not. It’s just speculation – some suspicion concerning characters that we’ve already confirmed are very deceptive propaganda operatives. Perhaps Jacobson is another link tying Jones to his prior identity. This is a starting point that perhaps warrants further examination.
Update: I spent the day doing a fresh install of Windows 8.1 and finally solved this problem – (I hope) – it was driving me nuts!
Funny how computers have become less and less useful and more and more cumbersome over time. The latest irritation is some change has occurred that causes the mouse to automatically click on whatever thing it is hovering over. I’ve changed control panel, the registry, and even bought a new mouse with new drivers and nothing has solved the problem. I’ve tried everything. Time for a re-boot from scratch. There are a bunch of programs running that seem to be obvious “spy” features for the government. For example, printspooler will contact the internet whenever something is printed – and large print jobs result in long debriefing periods while copies are sent to microsoft. The “windows image acquisition” service is often the #1 CPU user – sending constant screen shots back to microsoft. This is such a joke – why can’t they at least spy on us quietly without causing everything to slow down and break ? With Windows-10 being completely Orwellian it is high time we all escape from the microsoft dungeon and find new operating systems. It will be a learning curve to switch, but the effort will be worth it.
Ann Widdecombe asks Archbishop Justin Welby whether sodomy is wrong and he refuses to say so – start @ 12:00:
The goofy Anglicans are spiritual apostates coasting forward on the dying momentum of past orthodoxy. Their half-baked attempts to fool real bible Christians have become increasingly ridiculous and pathetic.
Real Christians must vacate and repudiate all the main-line denominations since the have all become completely apostate. The call of the hour for saved believers to their individual fidelity to Christ and the Bible outside of all the apostate churches which are now promoting sodomy and other evils.
No white woman is safe when Moslems are around. The reason why all Moslem men are rapists is because that is exactly what their religion tells them to do.
The Koran instructs Mohamedians that they are entitled to capture as many sex slaves as they want to satisfy their lusts. The term used to describe these victims kidnapped for sex is women the “right hands possess” – their “holy prophet” recommends that these woman – no matter their age, marriage, or condition – be captured and used by the Moslem for sex purposes – including pimping them out as prostitutes. It is not considered adultery to have sex with a married woman who is a sex slave. Mohamed himself (30:50+) set the example for his followers by using countless woman for sex, including his own nieces, his son’s wife, child brides, and many slave girls.
The language used is couched in pious religious talk, but the reality of these instructions is that they free the Moslem to capture women for sex.
- [4.3] And if you fear that you cannot act equitably towards orphans, then marry such women as seem good to you, two and three and four; but if you fear that you will not do justice (between them), then (marry) only one or what your right hands possess; this is more proper, that you may not deviate from the right course.
- [4.24] And all married women except those whom your right hands possess (this is) Allah’s ordinance to you, and lawful for you are (all women) besides those, provided that you seek (them) with your property, taking (them) in marriage not committing fornication. Then as to those whom you profit by, give them their dowries as appointed; and there is no blame on you about what you mutually agree after what is appointed; surely Allah is Knowing, Wise.
- [4.25] And whoever among you has not within his power ampleness of means to marry free believing women, then (he may marry) of those whom your right hands possess from among your believing maidens; and Allah knows best your faith: you are (sprung) the one from the other; so marry them with the permission of their masters, and give them their dowries justly, they being chaste, not fornicating, nor receiving paramours; and when they are taken in marriage, then if they are guilty of indecency, they shall suffer half the punishment which is (inflicted) upon free women. This is for him among you who fears falling into evil; and that you abstain is better for you, and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
- [23.5-6] And who guard their private parts, Except before their mates or those whom their right hands possess, for they surely are not blameable,
- [24.33] And let those who do not find the means to marry keep chaste until Allah makes them free from want out of His grace. And (as for) those who ask for a writing from among those whom your right hands possess, give them the writing if you know any good in them, and give them of the wealth of Allah which He has given you; and do not compel your slave girls to prostitution, when they desire to keep chaste, in order to seek the frail good of this world’s life; and whoever compels them, then surely after their compulsion Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
- [33.50] O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war, and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts, and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who fled with you; and a believing woman if she gave herself to the Prophet, if the Prophet desired to marry her– specially for you, not for the (rest of) believers; We know what We have ordained for them concerning their wives and those whom their right hands possess in order that no blame may attach to you; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.
[33.51] You may put off whom you please of them, and you may take to you whom you please, and whom you desire of those whom you had separated provisionally; no blame attaches to you; this is most proper, so that their eyes may be cool and they may not grieve, and that they should be pleased, all of them with what you give them, and Allah knows what is in your hearts; and Allah is Knowing, Forbearing.
- [70.29-31] And those who guard their private parts, Except in the case of their wives or those whom their right hands possess– for these surely are not to be blamed, But he who seeks to go beyond this, these it is that go beyond the limits–
The disgusting religion of Islam has spawned rapists – these men need to be annihilated and their religion needs to be completely eradicated.
I wrote about Alex Jones’ recent outlandish claim that an LA police officer was supposedly killed in the line of duty trying to “protect” Jones from a crazed assassin. A few days ago the “intelhub” revealed that Jones was ‘threatened’ in 2011 by some nut who later – three years later – ambushed a cop in California.
Which means, as suspected, Jones’ story was deceptive. The 3 year delay proves that the police officer didn’t die protecting Jones’ from any assassination attempt.
The Daily Fail wrote a year ago about the March 2014 cop shooting with extra details, such as the claim that the suspect actually shot himself afterwards. The entire story is rather strange and confusing. News reports: 1 2 3 4
This Alex Jones deception has infuriated a surprising person: Mike Adams from Natural News. The so-called Healthranger is fuming in disgust. And rightly so – Jones is standing in the pool of blood of a dead police officer for his own self-promotion. Read Mike Adam’s article from a couple days back here: “Is Alex Jones the Brian Williams of alternative media? Assassination claim conflates facts to spin tall tale that never happened…”
Once upon a time Mike Adams and Alex Jones were best Info-buddies together. So much so, somebody apparently morphed part of Adam’s face into creating one of Jones’ many fake childhood photos:
Ha ha? What does “ha ha” mean? Is Mike Adams threatening to reveal the true identities of John Conner and Bill Hicks ??
And here’s something else to mull over: The “Gong Show” guy Chuck Barris claimed that he worked as an assassin for the CIA. Read the plot line here: Confessions of a dangerous mind. Jones has claimed many strange things over the years – and he has even once said that he’s been accused of killing people. Could that be one way how the CIA entraps/commits their marks?
The Truth Sent From Above
1. This is the truth sent from above,
The truth of God, the God of love;
Therefore don’t turn me from your door,
But hearken all, both rich and poor.
2. The first thing, which I do relate,
Is God did man create
The next thing, which to you I tell,
Woman was made with man to dwell.
3. Then after this, ‘twas God’s own choice
To place them both in Paradise,
There to remain from evil free
Except they ate of such a tree.
4. But they did eat, which was a sin,
And thus their ruin did begin;
Ruined themselves, both you and me,
And all of their posterity.
5. Thus we were heirs to endless woes,
Till God the Lord did interpose
And so a promise soon did run
That He’d redeem us by his Son.
. . .
6. And at this season of the year
Our blest Redeemer did appear
He here did live, and here did preach,
And many thousands He did teach.
7. Thus He in love to us behaved,
To show us how we must be saved
And if you want to know the way
Be pleased to hear what He did say.
8. Go preach the Gospel new, He said,
To all the nations that are made
And he that does believe in me,
From all his sins I’ll set him free.
9. God grant to all within this place
True saving faith—that special grace,
Which to His people doth belong—
And thus I close my Christmas song.
“16 For where a testament is, there must also of necessity be the death of the testator. 17 For a testament is of force after men are dead: otherwise it is of no strength at all while the testator liveth.” (Hebrews 9:16-17)
A “testament” is a will. Before a person dies he can change his will, but upon death the last will becomes legally binding. The New Testament means what Christians will inherit because of the death of Jesus Christ on their behalf:
“28 For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins.” (Matthew 26:28)
That is the ‘New’ testament – but why is there an ‘Old’ testament? Whose testament is it? Who died? Who inherits?
In this passage it sounds like a reference to Moses and the law:
“14 But their minds were blinded: for until this day remaineth the same vail untaken away in the reading of the old testament; which vail is done away in Christ. 15 But even unto this day, when Moses is read, the vail is upon their heart.” (2 Corinthians 3:14-15)
Does this mean the 10 commandments constitute the “old testament” ? If so, who died? Who died to give rights under the 10 commandments to anybody?
“22 By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament.” (Hebrews 7:22)
The old testament is also called the first testament:”15 And for this cause he is the mediator of the new testament, that by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions that were under the first testament, they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance.” (Hebrews 9:15)
Again it seems like a reference to Moses and the law, but the blood under that covenant didn’t take away any sin – and nothing is inherited from the animals. The testator of the Old Testament can’t be millions of sheep, goats, doves, and cows. The testator can’t be Moses either – his death didn’t make the law effective.
The testator has to be somebody who dies and we inherit something from. It can’t be Jesus Christ because the death of Christ is under the new testament, not the old one.
The testator under the old testament must be Adam. When he ate of the forbidden fruit he died – spiritually. That put into effectiveness the Old Testament – the condemnation of death that descends upon all the children of Adam. It’s a testament that say we each inherit a curse down from Adam – we all die. “21 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. 22 For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive.” (1 Corinthians 15:21-22)
So the law of Moses is only a part of the old testament and under the testament of Adam’s death – it is written to people who are doomed to die. It cannot give them life – it can only serve to accentuate by laying out high moral standards the utter depravity of mankind.
“13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.” (Romans 7:13).
The old testament is death upon all the children of Adam; but the new testament is life to all who are born-again by Jesus Christ. Both testaments are made effective upon the death of the testator, and both grant an inheritance to the testator’s offspring. Adam gives us death by his carnal flesh and blood that comprise our bodies by human descent; Christ gives us his life by us receiving his spiritual flesh and blood into our hearts by faith.
Eating the elements of the communion service is a symbolic gesture that calls to remembrance both the death of Christ for us sinners 2000 years ago at Calvary, and the one-time transformation that occurred when we first trusted in Christ and became born-again.
Communion doesn’t repeat Christ’s death nor does it repeat our new-birth.
We are saved when, in repentance toward God, we acknowledge that Jesus died for our sins and rose again, and we receive him as our saviour. (1 Corinthians 15:1-5).
The Old Testament is still in effect working death by Adam, but the New Testament is also in now effect redeeming those who die by death under Old Testament. Future distributions under the New Testament are certain but still pending – such as the receipt of eternal bodies by resurrection from the grave and that God’s redeemed people should inhabit a sinless new heaven and earth forever.
Crazy Catholics “predicted” European crisis would lead to the rise of the so-called Great Catholic Monarch – better known by Bible Christians as the First Antichrist on the White Horse:
Compare Philadelphia (Bible Christians) and Thyatyria (Roman Catholics) in Revelation chapters 2 and 3 concerning which church gets dumped into the tribulation and which one gets saved from the tribulation.
The prophecies correctly indicate that the tribulation is longer than 7 years – it will last about 10 years. It begins with WW3, followed by peace, and then the Great Tribulation. Each period is about 3.5 years long. It’s all laid out in the scriptures.
“23 Curse ye Meroz, said the angel of the LORD, curse ye bitterly the inhabitants thereof; because they came not to the help of the LORD, to the help of the LORD against the mighty.” (Judges 5:23)
“33 ¶ The curse of the LORD is in the house of the wicked: but he blesseth the habitation of the just.” (Proverbs 3:33)
“27 He that giveth unto the poor shall not lack: but he that hideth his eyes shall have many a curse.” (Proverbs 28:27)
“2 As the bird by wandering, as the swallow by flying, so the curse causeless shall not come.” (Proverbs 26:2)
“8 And not rather, (as we be slanderously reported, and as some affirm that we say,) Let us do evil, that good may come? whose damnation is just.” (Romans 3:8)
“1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. 2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.” (Romans 13:1-2)
“11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.” (2 Thessalonians 2:11-12)
“1 But there were false prophets also among the people, even as there shall be false teachers among you, who privily shall bring in damnable heresies, even denying the Lord that bought them, and bring upon themselves swift destruction. 2 And many shall follow their pernicious ways; by reason of whom the way of truth shall be evil spoken of. 3 And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you: whose judgment now of a long time lingereth not, and their damnation slumbereth not.” (2 Peter 2:1-3)
“8 But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed. 9 As we said before, so say I now again, If any man preach any other gospel unto you than that ye have received, let him be accursed.” (Galatians 1:8-9)
“22 If any man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha.” (1 Corinthians 16:22)
They destroyed America, are destroying Europe – and now it is Japan’s turn for population replacement:
This is the final world empire where the toes of iron mix with miry clay.
“41 And whereas thou sawest the feet and toes, part of potters’ clay, and part of iron, the kingdom shall be divided; but there shall be in it of the strength of the iron, forasmuch as thou sawest the iron mixed with miry clay. 42 And as the toes of the feet were part of iron, and part of clay, so the kingdom shall be partly strong, and partly broken. 43 And whereas thou sawest iron mixed with miry clay, they shall mingle themselves with the seed of men: but they shall not cleave one to another, even as iron is not mixed with clay. 44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever. 45 Forasmuch as thou sawest that the stone was cut out of the mountain without hands, and that it brake in pieces the iron, the brass, the clay, the silver, and the gold; the great God hath made known to the king what shall come to pass hereafter: and the dream is certain, and the interpretation thereof sure.” (Daniel 2:41-45)
Kevin Booth indicates that when Bill Hicks first developed the Alex Jones character, the story line would include a crazed fan coming and shooting him live on the air:
In Linklater’s movie “Through a Scanner Darkly” (cf., 1 Corinthians 13:12) the Alex Jones character is abducted:
Alex Jones (Bill Hicks) has constantly “warned” his audience over the years that “they” are someday going to kill him.
Somebody tracking Hicks’ antics captured one of the tweets he’s put out:
And so now comes the latest ridiculous claim: Alex Jones (Bill Hicks) alleges that a police officer in Los Angeles actually died in the line of duty trying to capture a stalker who was trying to kill “Alex Jones”.
Alex Jones is all an act. He works for the main-stream media and his true identity is a failed comedian named Bill Hicks. Earlier this year Hicks/Jones announced that his 20 year career was over – and now with so many people aware of his true identity, the timing is right for him to finally fake his death, change his name again, and bug-out to New Zealand with all the other rats.
As the population of unmarried trendies continues to grow older year by year, many discontented old maids and bachelors are starting to realize that modern self-directed matchmaking is a bust. The tactic of finding a “soul-mate” through “dating” – the polite word for serial fornication– hasn’t worked. Perhaps the traditional ways were best.
- Modern Day Arranged Marriages: The Chinese Program
- Why Modern India’s Arranged Marriage System Works
- Why Are So Many Indian Arranged Marriages Successful?
- Arranged marriages: the preferred choice of Indian youth
- ‘Why I want an arranged marriage’
- Arranged Marriages Thrive in Modern Times
- The Rise of Arranged Marriage in America
- First Comes Marriage: Modern Relationship Advice from the Wise
- Arranged marriage is not forced marriage
- Modern Day Arranged Marriages: The Chinese Program
- What it feels like to have an arranged marriage
- How successful are arranged marriages?
- Arranged marriages: They’re not as unfortunate as you think
- 5 Myths and Facts About Arranged Marriages
- Arranged Marriages Were Better Than Modern Marriages.
- ‘People have found reason in arranged marriage today’
” And as it was in the days of Noe, so shall it be also in the days of the Son of man. They did eat, they drank, they married wives, they were given in marriage, until the day that Noe entered into the ark, and the flood came, and destroyed them all.” (Luke 17:26-27)