The Mack Quigley Report

King James Bible Believer

Are Orientals Asian?

Lately Orientals have followed the lead of the negroes and redskins by inventing newfangled resentment at being called exactly what they are, “Oriental” which means “Eastern.” They are people of the east (Genesis 10:30) and that’s why they are properly called Orientals.

But Oriental is allegedly now offensive since it not only has also been used to describe food, furniture, and animals – but it also is “Eurocentric” — meaning, I suppose, that White people shouldn’t be allowed to show off their superior understanding of compass points, or something like that. Read the rest of this entry »

The Lord Frustrates the Conspiracies of Evil Men


And they came to the chief priests and elders, and said,
We have bound ourselves under a great curse,
that we will eat nothing until we have slain Paul.

Acts 23:14.

Evil Jesuit scum have been treasonously conducting papist conspiracies against Protestants for nearly 500 years. The defeat of their 1605 Gunpowder Plot is celebrated every November 5th. Read the rest of this entry »

Alex Jones: info-hoaxster


Increasing the Birth-Rate of 1st World Nations

The most economically productive people on planet earth are the least productive when it comes to biologically reproducing themselves – and the ironic reason is that they have made idiotic social choices.

There is only one important factor determining a nation’s population increase: whether or not women ages 15 to 30 years are having babies.

If young women are going to school and/or starting careers in their 20’s while ‘waiting‘ to have children later, the country’s demographics are in big trouble.

Read the rest of this entry »

Dan Solomon fails to impress with article on Alex Jones being Bill Hicks

BILL HICKS IS ALEX JONESAn article by “Dan Solomon” of Texas Monthly reports on the speculation that Alex Jones is Bill Hicks without delving into any of the facts.

News media publications probably have many authors like “Dan Solomon” who are actually ghost writers, the name being a company “brand” that is owned by the newspaper/magazine to which are ascribed articles written by stay at home “journalists” writing on pay-per-piece basis. Or it could be that the “Dan Solomon” brand is a ghost-writing name farmed out to others through a separate media company entirely – produced in-house and then bid out to various journals. The exact inner workings of these arrangements would be impossible to determine because these things are closely guarded trade secrets.

Nevertheless, whoever the “Dan” person was who authored the article, he/she did a miserable job. Here are some of the things he did not consider or do before writing his article on Alex Jones being Bill Hicks:

1. He didn’t provide a list of the evidence at issue.

2. He didn’t take the photos of their matching teeth to a dentist to obtain a professional opinion on how identical they are.

3. He didn’t take the matching facial dimensions and matching profile shape to a forensic detective for an expert opinion on the likelihood of match.

4. He didn’t consult a plastic surgeon and the feasibility of altering Hicks’ face into Alex’ face.

5. He didn’t report on any inquiries he made into the Texas or FBI witness protection program – even if the reply would have been “no comment.”

6. He didn’t report on the extent of Kevin Booth’s association with Hicks/Jones or call him to get an explanation for why he listed both men as his “producer” for a 2013 film.

7. He didn’t obtain an actual birth certificate for Jones (not just a computer print-out), nor a death certificate for Bill Hicks (which are sealed in Arkansas for 50 years).

8. He didn’t interview anybody present when Hicks died, nor any of Jones childhood friends.

9. He didn’t try to obtain school records for Alex Jones.

10. He didn’t report on the photoshop anomalies put out by Alex Jones of himself as a child with different colour eyes or the fake yearbook photo.

11. He didn’t report on Jones’ constantly changing hair colour, his shaved eyebrows, his changing eye-colours.

12. He didn’t locate any of those suspicious of Alex Jones’ identity and ask them to explain their theories.

13. He didn’t report on Jones’ own admission of having family in the CIA, nor Hicks’ connection to Dr Frank Gannon, the confidant of Richard Nixon.

14. He didn’t analyse the numerous occasions Alex Jones confessed being Bill Hicks – and evaluate their sincerity.

15. He didn’t contact Alex Jones with the accusation and quote what sort of response was given.

16. He didn’t ask Kevin Booth to explain overlapping ownership interests of Bill Hicks/Alex Jones in Sacred Cow Productions, or why he made the strange choice of adopting Jones as Hicks replacement.

17. He didn’t investigate Hicks’ liberal fan-club’s on-going claims that he still “lives” – nor why they would celebrate a “right-winger” like Alex Jones.

18. He didn’t try to obtain copies of the video where Jerome Corsi called Alex Jones “Bill” nor contact Corsi for an explanation.

19. He didn’t anonymously ask around in Hicks’ comic subculture to see what sort of responses he would get.

20. He didn’t comment on the apparent age of Alex Jones who looks 12 or 13 years older than his stated age.

21. He didn’t question whether Jones’ absurd stage persona and gruff voice and stiff mannerism are all an act.

21. He didn’t delve into the TimeWarner connection to Austin Cable Access – investigating the connections Hicks/Jones has to major media.

22. He didn’t question that plausibility of the success obtained by a community college drop out who was nothing but a local cable access gadfly. Who helped him? Who financed him? Who trained him? Who supplied him with connections? Who built his organization?

23. He didn’t report on the oddity of a young man like Hicks dying of an old man’s disease like pancreatic cancer – nor did he ask a cancer expert to comment on the plausibility of Hicks doing stand-up comedy in November 1993 with a full head of hair despite 6 months of chemotherapy.

24. He didn’t inquire into Hicks’ medical care – why doctor “William Donovan” let Hicks die at home instead of getting treatment in a hospital.

25. Didn’t contact reporters who left infowars, people who have been harassed by a paranoid Alex Jones about ‘disclosing secrets’ – and who have spoken of being afraid for their lives because of him.

The so-called journalist “Dan Solomon” did none of the basic investigative work necessary when it came time to write the article about Alex Jones being Bill Hicks. The article he wrote instead was written by a hack who is only good at shovelling out entertaining little diddies of news-media propaganda – it is not the work of a real journalist.

“Dan” was so eager to repeat the masonic “33” in his article that he wrongly reported it as being Hick’s age at death – an error the UK Parliament repeated in their commemorations. The video ‘irrefutable proof’ is also 33 minuets long –  showing that everybody in this stunt is doing the wink-wink to each other about what is really going on.

It is rather unsurprising that the name “Dan Solomon” is also farmed out to the Onion on occasion – showing that the Texas Monthly report was part of a coordinated cover-up, a drive-by scorn-throw lamely attempting to bury the inconvenient truth about Alex Jones being Bill Hicks  – a fact that is becoming increasingly difficult to hide.


Liars get duped


The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies.” Psalm 58:3.

To lie well the liar needs to project confidence in the falsehood he is spouting. This requires him to engage in a preliminary step of first convincing himself of his own lie – lodging into his brain the notion that what he is about to affirm is in fact the truth. Having ‘temporarily’ stuck this wrong idea deeply and firmly into his own head, he can then speak feely –  and convincingly – uttering without reservation all the lies he has convinced himself of as if they were all 100% the truth.

A wicked doer giveth heed to false lips; and a liar giveth ear to a naughty tongue.” Proverbs 17:4.

That is the path to ‘success’ for a liar – he must be a good actor who transforms himself into the character of a person who wholeheartedly believes his lies with complete sincerity as if they were all true.

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.” John 8:44.

But there is a hidden flaw in this undertaking that the liar can’t see or understand. It happens without him even realizing that it happened. When he lodged the falsehood into his brain he ripped through a wall of natural resistance – an internal barrier that exists to repel lies. To achieve the convincing role of a liar, he had to cut holes through his inner membrane that filters out lies – and in so doing he permanently destroys his own ability to detect whenever lies are told to him by other people.

A false witness shall not be unpunished, and he that speaketh lies shall not escape.” Proverbs 19:5.

Think about what a tragedy that is. Whatever ‘advantage’ he temporarily gained by lying is more than offset by the handicap he now suffers from – he can no longer determine the truth of anything he hears.

Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron;” 1 Timothy 4:2.

Podcast: Is exposing Alex Jones/Bill Hicks a mean thing to do?

Truth that “Alex Jones is Bill Hicks” finally making an impact

It sure took a long while, but those few lone voices of truth, crying out in the internet wilderness have finally been heard and responded to: the facts of Bill Hicks’ deceptive transformation into Alex Jones are now facing a serious coordinated attack from The Onion, from Texas Monthly, and from Infowars.

That can only mean one thing – we’ve tipped off too many people.

Here is Bill Hicks only a few weeks before his alleged ‘death’ at a time when he reportedly had been undergoing chemotherapy for over 6 months:

hicks final showNotice anything strange? How many people endure 6 months of Chemotherapy and are able to retain not only tremendous energetic vitality – but also their full head of hair?!?

Nobody does. The death of Bill Hicks was a scam and we have proven conclusively that he returned as this ‘Alex Jones’ persona, the very ‘Rush Limbaugh’ like character that Kevin Booth admits he was developing:

alex jones confession kevin boothThe fact that they’ve now shifted into a coordinated campaign of ridicule shows that our success in raising awareness has not been in vain.

It is undoubtedly particularly unnerving to them to see their little inside gags exposed and have their ties to a subversive occult subculture brought out into the light of day:


The so-called “irrefutable proof” video that Texas Monthly and The Onion mock contains some of the weakest evidence exposing Jones, and it is mixed with a ridiculous accusation that the early Alex Jones was replaced by a later one. Why was such a weak video made, if not intentionally as a strawman easy to be knocked down?

Alex Jones is Bill Hicks

Alex Jones is Bill Hicks

Yet solid evidence of Jones photoshopping was ignored (e.g., childhood photos with both Blue and Brown eyes; yearbook photos with fake page-curls; etc.) and a complete study of all of  Hicks-Jones matching biometrics was left unexplained.

We did that matching and it shows without a doubt that Jones really is Bill Hicks. But our evidence wasn’t touched – the truth is way too toxic – so they are still ignoring us – but the can’t keep doing so forever.

It is important that people realize the mass-media is CIA controlled and it has turned Bill Hicks into “Alex Jones” for one reason: to deceive Americans.

Study the following article carefully and you can only come to one conclusion, that Alex Jones really is Bill Hicks:


See also Video-podcast.

“He that giveth her not in marriage doeth better” ??

1Japan_0971“So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well; but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better.” 1 Corinthians 7:38.

I’ve heard this verse misinterpreted by some as if it says that St Paul was calling celibacy ‘better’ than marriage.

If so then Paul would have contradicted his prior statement in the same chapter:

“But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.” 1 Corinthians 7:9.

Paul strongly favours that people get married:

“I will therefore that the younger women marry, bear children, guide the house, give none occasion to the adversary to speak reproachfully.” 1 Timothy 5:4.

“Notwithstanding she shall be saved in childbearing, if they continue in faith and charity and holiness with sobriety.” 1 Timothy 2:15.

“For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his wife, and they two shall be one flesh…. Nevertheless let every one of you in particular so love his wife even as himself; and the wife see that she reverence her husband.” Ephesians 5:31,33.

He urged marriage particularly upon those in church leadership:

“A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;” 1 Timothy 3:2.

“Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well.” 1 Timothy 3:12.

“For this cause left I thee in Crete, that thou shouldest set in order the things that are wanting, and ordain elders in every city, as I had appointed thee: If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly.” Titus 1:5-6.

Although Paul was single, he asserted that it was his right to marry if he so desired:

“Have we not power to lead about a sister, a wife, as well as other apostles, and as the brethren of the Lord, and Cephas?” 1 Corinthians 9:5.

And he identified mandatory celibacy as a satanic doctrine:

“Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils; Speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared with a hot iron; Forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from meats, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of them which believe and know the truth.” 1 Timothy 4:1-3.

[Paul opens up chapter 7 by writing in the first verse, “Now concerning the things whereof ye wrote unto me: It is good for a man not to touch a woman.” The only proper context for human intimacy is between husband and wife. Thus marriage, including divorce and re-marriage, is always better than fornication. Those that satanically forbid marriage – whether to priests/nuns, or to those with living prior spouses – are doing the devil’s work by encouraging fornication. (Rev. 2:20)]

Thus the position of St Paul on marriage is therefore very clear from all his writings, and it is obviously a mistake to minimize what he said by taking select verses from 1 Corinthians chapter 7 out of context – verses that announce the Christian liberty to remain single.

Paul writes:

 5 Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.
 6 But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment.
 7 For I would that all men were even as I myself. But every man hath his proper gift of God, one after this manner, and another after that.
 8 I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I.
 9 But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.

Thus all who have fleshly appetites are suppose to marry, but those without such desires are free to not participate in a marriage.

Paul, who optimistically saw the Lord’s victory in every situation of Christian living (Romans 8:28), calls the lack of desire a ‘gift’ – the person can then serve the Lord with less distraction:

” 32 But I would have you without carefulness. He that is unmarried careth for the things that belong to the Lord, how he may please the Lord:”

Paul’s admonitions here were directed to adults living in Corinth, a “Las Vegas” sort of town full of immorality. Paul was helping them transition from a loose and worldly culture into a manner of living marked by mature, sensible, and godly choices about marriage, divorce, and remarriage. Without condemnation or legalism, he urges all of them who have biological drives, to get married, stay married, or get re-married in the Lord, and thus avoid fornication.

But when it comes to a young girl still under her parent’s command, St Paul backs-off from his pro-marriage urging so as not to create undue pressure for her father to rashly place the girl in an inappropriate marriage.

“36 But if any man think that he behaveth himself uncomely toward his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will, he sinneth not: let them marry.
 37 Nevertheless he that standeth stedfast in his heart, having no necessity, but hath power over his own will, and hath so decreed in his heart that he will keep his virgin, doeth well.
 38 So then he that giveth her in marriage doeth well; but he that giveth her not in marriage doeth better.”

The father who is waiting for the right husband for his daughter can continue to say “no” to the suitors who ask for his daughter’s hand in marriage without feeling pressured by St Paul.

Of course, as time goes by the daughter is getting older and older and the father comes under a natural pressure from society and all the relatives to give permission to somebody before too much time elapses!

The idea is that if, say, the daughter is 15 and the father insists in all good conscience that he refuses to allow his daughter to marry a particular suitor, then the father is commended as having done “better” – it is “better” because he refused to give permission while he had doubts. Paul was always very careful to urge Christians to not offend their own conscience by doing what they doubt. The solution is to pray and get light on the situation until the Lord removes the doubts and makes the proper choices clear.

So it is “better” because the father can simply wait until such time as his doubts are dissolved. If he had said “yes” too soon he would not be doing the sensible thing.

This is not a permanent decision that Paul is speaking of – it is only the decision the father makes at a certain time. Perhaps in a few years he will believe that she is sufficiently mature and that the suitor is sufficiently appropriate, and then he will give his permission to marry without any reservation.

But at a certain age the girl becomes a woman who is legally old enough to make her own decisions, and then what St Paul wrote beforehand – that all with desires should marry – applies to her regardless of her father’s decision.


Larry Klayman’s deportation petition against Obama

Link (pdf)


The Bizarre logic of “traditional” Catholic schismatics

World's biggest cult is the Roman Catholic Church.

World’s biggest cult is the Roman Catholic Church.

What is the difference between the ex-catholic Protestants that arose during the reformation, and the ex-catholic ‘sede vacante’ traditionalists that have arisen since Vatican II was promulgated?

The traditionalists hold that the professing Roman Catholic religion is now in apostasy – but irrationally cling to ultramontane notions of the infallibility, supremacy, and exclusivity of ‘Peter’s throne’ over Christianity.

Recent popes kiss korans, welcome atheists, forbid proselyting of Jews, hide child-molesters, practice money laundering, condone evolution, encourage religious irreverence and disorder, and so forth. The popes have all figured out that in order to ‘survive’ and stay ‘relevant’ in today’s world their religion must keep pace with the fashion of modern attitudes.

The traditionalists watch this transpire in horror.

Since the Council of Trent they held the prejudiced notion of an ultramontane exclusivity of their Roman Catholic religion against those ex-Catholics, such as Luther, Knox, Calvin, and Latimer, who departed Rome to better follow the teachings of Holy Scripture. The bigoted back-lash of Trent’s anathemas against those Protestant Christians asserted the reign of the authority of Catholic traditions as supreme over the hearts and minds of the Roman Catholic masses. The Jesuits’ appeal to base feelings of Catholic prejudice was very successful – the unenlightened Catholic people were encouraged to develop, and maintain, a deep rooted suspicion against all Bible-based Christianity – and to this day that has prevented them from being evangelized to the truth.

But now we have ‘traditionalists’ who are stuck nursing their old prejudices against Bible-Christianity while at the same time watching their professed ‘true authority’ of the Roman Curia denounce suspicion and prejudice and welcome a new modernistic religious outlook that is universal.

So what is a poor bigoted ‘traditionalist’ to do in such a situation? His idols in Rome have fallen on their faces – will he realize his error and turn to the Bible for authority? No, of course not! He will invent a goofy idea that we might call “the rapture of the Roman Curia” — his gods vanished into thin air and fallen idols suddenly took their place.

This convenient fantasy allows the traditional Catholic to believe his ‘gods’ were true, because the things that are fallen aren’t his gods, they are just statues that suddenly appeared. Where did his gods go then? Well that’s a mystery – perhaps they were raptured?!

But if the popes and Catholic hierarchy are apostate, and of course they are, then those ex-Catholics who left the religion 500 years ago to follow the Bible weren’t wrong.

One of the funny-bunnies of this group is a guy named Voris who hypocritically demanded that protestants submit to Rome even while he called his show “Catholic” without first seeking approval to do so from his own religious overlords ! But that’s just par for the course – these fanatical idiots are a satanic jumble of inconsistencies and hypocrisy. They have rejected now both Bible and Pope and wander in a worse place than if they had never encountered either. And it goes without saying, all the traditionalists disagree with one other on the correct path to take now that their religion has sunk.

Some nominally Catholic ‘traditionalists’ (no endorsement – links given for laughs):





Google suppressing “Impe*ch Obuma” …

OBAMA CRIMINAL USURPER… millions of outraged people want the criminal fraudster immediately removed, so right now that’s being scrubbed from the search engines to try to put a stop to the momentum.

Removing illegal usurper Obama by impeachment is not impossible.

First the House of Representatives must vote to “impeach” (accuse) by a simply majority, and then the Senate votes to remove (convict) by a 67% majority.

In 2015 the Republicans will control 57% of the House of the Representatives (244 seats of 432) so obtaining the first “impeachment” step is relatively easy. But since Republicans will only control 53% of the Senate (53 seats of 100) everybody is saying that the second step of conviction and removal is impossible.

But that’s really not true when we consider 2 things :

1. Only a simple majority vote of 51% is needed to change the senate’s own rules of procedure. That means the Republicans can change their rules to streamline the senate impeachment conviction procedure so that an immediate vote of the entire Senate can be held upon receipt of impeachment notification from the House of Representatives.   And the House can change their rules just as easily to make impeachment a summary procedure that can get proposed and passed within a matter of minutes.

2. According to the Constitution (Art 1, Sec 1) a simple majority of 51 senators constitutes a quorum.

So all the Republicans need to do – if they weren’t all a bunch of spineless cowards – would be to change the House and Senate rules and quietly wait for a day when they could suddenly and without warning conduct surprise votes on impeachment and removal at a time when only a few democratic members are present to object.

In order for this to work without a flaw, there have to be 51 Republican senators available to vote yes at a time when there are 25 (or less) Democrat senators available.

If there are more than 26 democrats available, they can all vote and it will block a 2/3 majority (since 27×2 is 54 which is greater than the total number of republican senators). But if there are 50 or less Republicans present, then all the Democrats can leave before the vote and it will legally deprive the senate of the ‘majority’ quorum it needs to conduct business.

So if 51 Republicans are present with only 25 Democrats, then there is nothing the Democrats can do – whether they vote or they leave – that will stop the impeachment conviction from passing. (Also works with 52 vs 26).

Of course, if the Senate and House were ever to conduct this they should lump Obama and Biden together into a joint impeachment. That is legitimate since Biden is just as guilty of treason for cooperating with and supporting all of the illegal and unconstitutinal crap that Obama is guilty of. Throw them both out.

For all John Boehner’s flaws, at least he was born in the United States, but any Republican Speaker of the House would make an infinitely better president than the current illegal bozo.

To pull this impeachment-coup off successfully the Republicans would have to keep their plan a total secret and then act very suddenly. I’d love to see it happen.

Been busy with work …

Liberal phoney Republican “leaders” are threatening to “sue” the Kenyan usurper in court — hoping perhaps they can find a judge who will be brave while they act like cowards. Could it get any more ridiculous? Fortunately I’ve been too busy with work to give it much care.

Meanwhile, one of the areas of learning I feel I need to round-out is a better understanding of the Orthodox branch of Christianity. I find their link to the true Textus Receptus line of manuscripts interesting, as well as their links to Russia which plays such an important role in bible prophecy. Their rejected of the pope, and married priests are both good – but on many other points they are just as bad as the Roman Catholics in dead, stale, sacramentalism and in idolatry and mariolotry.

But some of their singing-chant-like prayers are uplifting –

I wonder sometimes wonder if Bible-Baptist theology can’t be combined with the great solemnity of the older modes of worship found in what are largely dead/apostate – but beautiful – churches. That’s probably my own fleshly desire for an aesthetic ‘experience’ – a weakness I’ll have to reflect on.

One of the great ‘early fathers’ of the Greek Church is St John Chrysostom – and from what little I’ve read of him he seems to be an surprisingly good resource (because many ‘church fathers’ are completely unreliable). But the final authority by which all writings are judged – whether from a ‘father’ or not – is the Holy Bible (King James Version) – so I might change my opinion about him after I’ve read more and had more time to double-check.

Here he writes against the judaizers:

Is Alex Jones’ toady Paul Watson a New-Ager?

This is a follow to the article “INFOWARS CONNECTED TO LUCIFERIANISM

The most prolific and dedicated and long-term of Alex Jones’ (AKA Bill Hicks’) several researchers is the Englishman Paul Watson, who comes from the slums of Sheffield, UK.

If his homepage “The Truth is Now” is any indication, Watson is heavily under the sway of various false New-age ideas.

The lead quote on his page is attributed to by C Clement Stone, a “New Thought” enthusiast – the ideas behind the various modern “religious-science” and positive thinking cults. Also on the top are links to his pages devoted to new agers such as occultist Jordan Maxwell, far left journalist John Pilger, and esoterica-peddler Michael Tsarian. Another section on his webpage is devoted to “Spirituality” and it carries a smorgasbord of new age religious garbage: various Hindus, Buddhists, occultits, and even a blithering negro “guru” huckster named Tony Moo (Mooji“). All these blind nuts have no salvation to offer anybody – and while they have rejected the Lord Jesus Christ, they foolishly await instead the arrival of Maitreya, the coming “World Teacher,” — yet better know as antichrist

Paul Watson would not be so single-minded in linking up to these sorts of people unless he himself was also new-ager.

So pray for this guy Paul Watson, he is obviously very confused. He is being religiously misguided by the devil.

The Truth is only found in the Lord Jesus Christ. His words are truth (John 17:17) and they can be read in English in the King James Bible – therefore those that reject him are without excuse.

Mr Watson needs to repent of all the religious crap he’s been following and get saved.

Many of them also which used curious arts brought their books together, and burned them before all men: and they counted the price of them, and found it fifty thousand pieces of silver. So mightily grew the word of God and prevailed.” Acts 19:19-20.

Some tracts for Watson to read:


School Shooting Fakery continues in Marysville

marysvilleSame old same old.


Temple Mount: House of Prayer for All People


The religious complex that is going to be built on the Temple Mount following World War 3 will not be exclusively for the worship of the LORD, but rather it will be constructed as an ecumenical pantheon of religious blasphemy.

After three and a half years of this apostate sacrilegious garbage on the Temple Mount, terrible wrath from the LORD will fall on the entire world because of jealousy for the throne of his glory which the wicked Jews allowed to be profaned for the worship of other gods.

This is prophesied in the Holy Bible, including in Ezekiel 8 and 9 (which see).

= = =


14 More Temple Activists Threatened

Netanyahu: Jews Won’t Be Kept Out of Temple Mount

Temple Institute Head: Shooting Was Bound to Happen

Yehudi Glick - on Temple Mount showing plans for Third Temple American born Rabbi Yehuda Glick is a valiant Jewish campaigner for rebuilding the Holy Temple; for seeking after his God this way he was shot four times in the chest by a Palestinian jihadi who had been released from prison by Israel. The Arab terrorist was killed by police and the PA “president’ Mahmoud Abbas sent his condolences to the killer’s family. Glick is clinging to his life in hospital. Pray that Mr Glick will get saved receiving the Lord Jesus Christ as his saviour.

The Power of Joy

Feel like the weight of the world is on your shoulders?

Feel like the weight of the world is on your shoulders?

Don’t be weary, keep marching pilgrim! every day we get a little closer to eternal glory.

“This day is holy unto the LORD your God; mourn not, nor weep. For all the people wept, when they heard the words of the law. Then he said unto them, Go your way, eat the fat, and drink the sweet, and send portions unto them for whom nothing is prepared: for this day is holy unto our LORD: neither be ye sorry; for the joy of the LORD is your strength.” Nehemiah 8:9-10.

Be joyful, Christian, tackle your heavy problems with a light heart full of Christ’s joy.

But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, Meekness, temperance: against such there is no law.” Galatians 5:22-23.

I am NOT voting

voting stupidity

The Republicans perpetrated the Twin Towers terrorism hoax on September 11, 2001 and not one of them has ever come out publicly to repudiate such a monstrously absurd and dishonest means of manipulating the American voter. The Republicans have also refused to hold the sodomite birth certificate forger Barry “Thank you Satan” Soetaro, a.k.a. Hussein Obola, who has usurped the office of president – and this despite the fact that they have controlled the House of Representatives for the last eight years.

Neither have the Republicans done anything regarding all the other godless mayhem that the federal judiciary has been enacting to create a Union of Sodomite States of America.

The Republicans are worthless idiots. They don’t deserve votes – and if the run the Senate they will do only one thing – push for warmongering on an even greater scale. This election will put the Republicans into power in both houses of the Congress and they will demand that World War Three commence immediately against Iran and Russia.

And once that adventure is underway the current un-repayable mountain of 18 Trillion dollars in national debt will then double or triple or quadruple to unimaginable levels way beyond the stratosphere.

The best thing Christians can do is refuse to vote and that way delegitimize the current system entirely. Don’t bother voting 3rd parties – they aren’t even qualified to get on the ballot in most states. The two party winner take all federal system doesn’t work and we need to divorce ourselves from it.

The civil law cannot run our schools – they teach the children to become atheists and sex perverts. The civil authorities cannot run our family court – they let sodomites adopt children to abuse. They civil law cannot define marriage or divorce – they have sanctified as a marriage the holy buggery of men who fornicate each other in the anus. This is the insanity of the current system.

The “conservative” party puts up a mild show of resisting changes, but once the occur, they act like that is the new “conservative” status quo that must be maintained.  Don’t change it further they say, but once it is changed, they will defend that new status quo. That how it is now with that illegal “Obamacare” – the “conservative” Republicans are just going to let it continue to exist. Conservative Republicans have no true principles.

It was the “Republican” Reagan who gave an “amnesty” to millions of illegal aliens in the 1980’s which effectively turned the southwestern United States into a Mexican barrio. Those millions of illegals now vote consistently for the Democrats and thereby cancel out the votes of all those true Americans whose forefathers have lived in the country since before the Revolution of 1776.

Of course the Democrats are godless and evil and their leadership is effectively Communistic – but I still won’t vote Republican simply as an ‘alternative’. If you vote, then you must accept the outcome of that vote. You support a corrupt system. The liberals who run the fake Republican party know how easy it is to manipulate good people – just give them Republican losers to vote for. Assure them that the system works and that their vote counts. It doesn’t. It’s a lie.

If your vote counts then make the Republicans earn it. Let them lose every election from this point forward and teach them a lesson. American democracy has been hijacked by stupid sloganering like “one man one vote” that has given equality in managing the country to good for nothing losers.

Americans voted for Constitutional Amendments in the states that defined marriage to only be between a man and a wife – but that did no good. The Federal Courts said “NOPE!” and there went voting out the window. Yet those same Federal Courts act indignant that certain minorities might not be given their full right to vote – including the right to vote fraudulently and repeatedly without showing any identification! Why should any black or Mexican have a right to vote in the country that was founded and built and paid for by White Anglo-Saxon Protestants? Their so-called “right to vote” is a sick joke against the White population. They vote consistently for only one thing – to steal our money and property via government hand-outs.

Voting is participating in an evil system:

Thou shalt not follow a multitude to do evil; neither shalt thou speak in a cause to decline after many to wrest judgment:Neither shalt thou countenance a poor man in his cause.” Deuteronomy 23:2-3.

Voting is not God’s way of doing things:

In those days there was no king in Israel, but every man did that which was right in his own eyes.” Judges 17:6.

No, I am not voting. I refuse to lend any credibility to this stupid wicked system which needs to repent and submit itself under the Lordship of Jesus Christ.

But the LORD said unto Samuel, Look not on his countenance, or on the height of his stature; because I have refused him: for the LORD seeth not as man seeth; for man looketh on the outward appearance, but the LORD looketh on the heart.” 1 Sam 16:7.

Rampant Dishonesty at Norman Geisler’s so-called ‘Inerrancy’ Conference

Here is their so-called ‘pledge’ page:


Aside from generating a mass-mailing marketing list for Norman Geisler’s future fund-raising campaigns ($$$!!!), this gimmick accomplishes nothing good.

First glaring problems it that their statement does not define its terms. It says “the Bible” without specifying what that means. It comes from a word that means “book” but they don’t mean any book in the entire world.

The adjective “infallible” applies to an totally missing phantom that does not exist anywere on planet earth today: “the original text“?! Where and what is this so-called “original text”? It’s nowhere and nothing.

It doesn’t exist anywhere – so you can make all sorts of bold pronouncements about how great it WAS – but you can’t honestly use the present tense verb “is” because that’s a bold face lie. The “original text” is a WAS – if it ever was.

But it never even was because “text” means the entire work together. Originals are – according to all the scholars – separate manuscripts individually written. Those original manuscripts – those “innerant” autographs – were never compiled into any book. They never formed a complete text or Bible at any time. The idiots who run the phoney-baloney “inerrancy conference” want to pretend a big show of fundamentalism, while in actuality they are boldly proclaiming their own total agnosticism regarding God’s words!

This missing, unseen, ghostly, extinct creature – “the original text” – they declare to be the ONLY infallible “Word of God” in the world. Well then what are they saying? Since the only infallible “Word of God” is gone with the wind, what is left that is infallible? Nothing! Nothing is sure because that “originalt text” doesn’t exist!

If it alone is the ONLY infallible written Word of God – as their bold pronouncement declares – then what about every single Bible in print today? The implication of what they are stating is blatantly obvious – it is their logical axiomatic declaration:


Well how about that? Who needs to waste their time listing to a conference of infidel morons who come to the very same conclusion regarding the Bible that of any atheist!

These people are tares among the wheat. These are deceitful workers. These are the creeps who crept in. These are the heady fools who rejected God’s words and were thrust into gross darkness. They are doing their work to destroy the autonomy of the Bible-believer so they can bring back the Dark Ages when ecclesiastical-religious ‘experts’ in league with the Roman whore held absolute sway over the spiritual lives of the ordinary people.

Notice that they don’t even mention God’s words - as in specific individual exact words. They don’t even address that. Instead it is the capitalized “Word” – meaning what? It means whatever they want it to mean. Does it mean Jesus Christ? Perhaps it means the whole work in sum – but in any particular detail.

These people are setting up their own theological conspiracy against the words of God written in English in the King James Bible. The whole point of this is to be able to stop their ears from hearing what God has said in English, which any plough-boy can quote verbatum as absolute authority. They resent the notion that their training and degrees does not make them immune from being read the riot act from out of the pages of the Authorized Version.

These seminary people do the devil’s work. We were never told to build colleges or get theological degrees. Their entire work and ministry is out of the will of God who ordained local churches to carry on the work of preaching New Testament Christianity to the world. The seminary is a dead-end where the devil traps many intelligent fools, cooping them up and draining from them all spiritual vitality. They have injected doubt about God’s words already given to the Church in the King James Bible, and sponsored the production of false modernistic Bibles from corrupt manuscripts that they re-dredged up after God had rejected them.

We now have God’s exact words in English in the King James Bible. We don’t need to learn any Greek or Hebrew. The need for this time is for people to know the words of God in the Authorized Version, to believe them, and to preach them with 100% authority as being completely true – because they are. That Book is the Bible where God’s words are found in English exactly as he wants them written.

The notion that a prior writing in a prior language that God has historically dumped into oblivion is somehow superior to the Book that God has actually used, preserved, and made the most popular book ever published is absolutely categorically absurd to the extreme.

Who cares what that dead conservative apostate Norm Giesler thinks about any “original text” – his opinion can perish with him. But the Monarch of Books will live on. He’s an infidel and is rejected because he has rejected the absolute authority of the KING JAMES BIBLE in English.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 274 other followers