Believing in Islam is Irrational

Posted on January 20


ALLAH hubal muslim moon godMohamet’s mad ramblings were only put into a “Koran” book several decades after he was dead.

Surviving Korans (Sana’a, Topkapi, and Samarkand manuscripts) show that they are incomplete and contain many mistakes – there is no “perfect” Koran – that is just a religious myth that ignorant people believe.

Anybody can claim that an “angel” talked to him while he was sleeping. This was probably a mental disorder – or demons – or both. We do not have to diagnose it – that is irrelevant – we reject whatever nonsense he said because we are logical and scientific.

The important points are:

(1) Mohamet thought he heard an angel talking in his head;

(2) only Mohamet saw this angel, nobody else;

(3) Mohamet admitted that he did not hear from God, but just an “angel”;

(4) Mohamet’s visions contradict eye-witness reports and valid history of facts recorded by real witnesses;

(5) Mohamet never saw or heard the facts about the Bible because he lived 600 years later;

(6) when Mohamet was asked by the sceptics to show supernatural proofs to validate his alleged encounters with an “angel,” Mohamet could not do so;

(7) instead of providing supernatural proofs, Mohamet accused sceptics of being evil people because they refused to believe him and God was testing them to believe without proof;

(8) Mohamet claimed that his recitations from the “angel” were so wonderful that people only needed to hear them to believe them – yet the copies of his Koran show changes, mistakes, confusion, and historical errors;

(9) Mohamet claimed his angel was from God, but Mohamet also claimed that there were “good” Djinn who listened to him too – thus showing that Mohamet had no sense to reject devils;

(10) Mohamet and his successors had to resort to killing people to coerce them by force into believing his stories.

There are many other points that could be raised, but how many do logical people need before they understand the truth? Logical people are reasonable – they do not hold to nonsensical beliefs after being confronted by so many rational facts and evidences that clearly demonstrate that they come from an unreliable source.

On the other hand, it is irrational people and fanatics who are unreasonable in their position – they hold to their beliefs even when evidence, logic, and common sense tell them that they have been mistaken.

Thus reasonable people will reject the Koran because it comes from an unreliable source who had no proof other than his own visions; and they will accept instead first-hand testimony by eye-witnesses in the Bible.

This is the logic which rational modern people follow.

We only have to compare how the source acquired the information to determine that there are two different methods:

#1 Method: the Bible comes from first-hand reports of events recorded by many eye-witnesses;

vs.

#2 Method: the Koran comes from one man’s visions of an angel 600 years after the facts.

Rational people who accept common sense will be able to select between the two methods which one is more reliable.

Related articles
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in: What's so and not so