Koran versus Bible

Posted on January 12


bible verified by contemporaneous eye witnesses testimony
Bible is Fact, but Koran is Fantasy.

Let’s compare Mohamed’s account of the life of Christ, with that given by the New Testament authors.

The deeds and words of Jesus Christ from 30 AD to 33 AD were recorded down by the very men who actually saw and heard them. They wrote their accounts down and published them to the scrutiny of the entire world in the years 35 AD to 95 AD. They recorded that Jesus Christ rose from the dead and was seen by over 500 eye witnesses at one time.

The disciples who all turned away in fear and disappointment after watching their messiah die on the cross – three days later became a unified band of fearless witnesses – testifying that Jesus Christ was no longer dead – but had risen from the dead to eternal life. These men preached the new gospel, “now made manifest by the appearing of our Saviour Jesus Christ, who hath abolished death, and hath brought life and immortality to light…” 2 Timothy 1:11.

The holy men who wrote scripture were named Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, James, Jude, Peter, and Paul. They confirmed their testimony to their deaths – affirming their witness even through cruel deaths of martyrdom. As miracle workers and prophets they also confirmed their word by supernatural signs from God.

According to the New Testament eye witnesses Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, James, Jude, Peter, and Paul the following three facts are certain:

  1. Jesus Christ was the Son of God,
  2. Jesus Christ died for sinners on Cavalry’s cross,
  3. Jesus Christ rose again on the third day with eternal life.

None of this has anything to do with religious ideologies, or pious teachings, or somebody’s religious beliefs or rituals. These are simply historical facts. that can be proven in a court of law by eye-witness testimony.

600 years later along comes Mohamed.

Imagine you have just sat in the jury box for several weeks hearing the eye-witnesses testify how they saw and heard Jesus Christ themselves in 30 AD in Palestine as he proved himself to be the Son of God and how he died for sinners and rose again from the dead.

Now the other side wants to call their only witness – a lone man who will seek to claim that all the other witnesses are liars.

This man proposes to testify that Jesus Christ is not the Son of God, that Jesus Christ did not die on the cross, and that Jesus Christ did not rise again from the dead with eternal life.

Of course, before anyone is allowed to testify in court he must first convince the judge that he is competent to be a witness. He must be both (#1) sane, and (#2) an eye-witness.

Is Mohamed a sane eye-witness? NO!

Q #1: Is he sane? This proposed witness suffered from acute bouts of mental illness that made him suicidal and despondent. He suffered seizures and was convinced that he was demon-possessed. He heard voices in his head. He believed he was chosen by God to be the very best and highest prophet ever. He is sexually obsessed – fornicating with countless women and girls – some as young as 6 years old. He has filthy habits and will  kiss inside the mouths of little boys. He is convinced that a 600 winged angel named “Gabriel” visits him during his epileptic seizures. The angel has told him that all prior scriptures are corrupted – he thinks that he alone has been chosen by the angel to recite to the people of earth a revised version of the scriptures in Arabic.

Is he sane? Of course not. The profile of this witness is an absolute joke – too pitiful for consideration. He is mentally ill. Would any court accept the testimony of such a lunatic? Absolutely not!

Question No. #2: Did he personally see or hear anything? What first-hand information does he have to offer us? NOTHING!

Mohamed lives in the Arabian desert in in 600′s. He wants to re-write the testimony of the real eye-witnesses to Jesus Christ’s life who lived in 30 AD in Jerusalem. Jesus companions were Jews who spoke Hebrew and Greek, and they personally saw and heard with there own eyes all the facts that they testify to in the New Testament.

But this Mohamed lived 600 years later, he is an Arab, he doesn’t speak Hebrew or Greek, has never been to Palestine, and he has never seen nor heard anything that transpired during the life of Jesus Christ on this earth during 30 AD to 33 AD. It goes without saying that of course Mohamed has never even met Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, James, Jude, Peter, or Paul. In other words, this Mohamed nut has absolutely NO personal information. He is disqualified.

Would any court on earth allow Mohamed to contradict the testimony of the actual eye-witnesses because Mohamed claimed that an angel visited him 600 years later? This suggestion is asinine – it is laughable.

He had a dream – dreams are not evidence. You can dream anything you want. It does not constitute evidence. Mohamed had a dream in Arabic in Arabia over SIX CENTURIES after the fact!

Because he personally knows nothing about the facts, the man is rejected.

Would such a witness be allowed to offer any testimony in the case? NO! NEVER! NO WAY!

Such a witness would be fined heavily for wasting the court’s time and admonished to leave town immediately before he was arrested or lynched.

Stupid Moslems still believe Mohamed.

The stupid moslems still call this joker “prophet” Mohamed. They even think that a book called the “Koran” magically floated down from outerspace into his hands. They don’t realize how unscientific and irrational their beliefs are.

Why would any sane person think that a man can have a dream and then re-write historical facts that occurred 600 years earlier?

We have the eye-witness testimony from 30 AD called the New Testament. It is reality that can be proven in a court of jurisprudence on the basis of the rational laws evidence.

On the other hand, what Mohamed has to offer 600 years later is absolutely IRRELEVANT. It is inadmissible in every court in the world.

Let’s compare:

A Mohamedian has unfounded “beliefs,” but a Christian has FACTS.

A Mohamedian has unfounded “faith,” but a Christian has HISTORICAL REALITY.

A Mohamedian has unfounded “religion,” but a Christian has INFALLIBLE PROOFS.

A Mohamedian has his nutty prophet’s “Koran” but a Christian has,

A RISEN SAVIOUR, THE SON OF GOD, WHO DIED FOR THE SINS OF THE WORLD!

“What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the LORD.” Jeremiah 23:28.