The alleged Norway terrorist Anders Behring Breivik is alleged to have authored a manifesto that bemoans the fact that Christian nations are weakened by the meekness of Christianity from confronting internal threats such as come from Moslem immigrants.
Of course, the Norway terrorist event is another one of the lying frauds that the intelligence services have concocted. (Why they are called “intelligence” is a mystery – if they had any intelligence they would realize how self-defeating it is to perpetrate one lying scam after another, wasting all their credibility, and inevitably earning the disgust of the public they sought to keep fooling).
Many things confirm that that the event was a fraud: news reports showing smoke from the the alleged bomb site were concocted from still photos; the patsy called the police repeatedly during his “massacre” attempting to turn himself in and was never picked up; extent of bombing damage doesn’t make sense; the police took several hours to reach him on the island; the photos of the “terrorist” himself were photoshopped; his facebook was hacked; several photos of alleged victims show signs of photoshopping; photos of the “terrorist” being driven away were photoshoped and do not match the video footage; trial has been averted by declaring the “terrorist” insane.
Given that these facts, it would be foolhardy for any rational person to accept at face-value anything reported by the news media concerning this alleged “terrorist” event and alleged “terrorist“. Given that they faked 3,000 dead on 9/11 it would be a minor thing to fake a few dozen dead in Norway. The burden to prove the extent of the fakery is not on the public – the existing facts already don’t add up, so the burden is on the state to prove that it is not fakery. Until that time, we must use common sense and dismiss the whole event as a false-flag incident that was conducted pursuant to the whole “strategy of tension” doctrine.
It is curious that NATO chose to cast their terrorist as an odd-ball knight of Malta Freemason psuedo-Christian Zionist Islamaphobic “conspiracy theorist” – characterized in the news media simply as a “right-wing fundamentalist”.
For their fictional villain they drafted a lengthy manifesto that would state his world view. The psychotic patsy they arrested is too wacko to have actually written this document – but serves to create some talking points about how dangerous the enemies of “multiculturalism” are. In the manifesto the terrorist is careful to call himself a cultural Christian and not one who has actually accepted Jesus Christ as saviour. We can thank the spook who added this little detail of clarification because it clearly put the terrorist into the camp of an unsaved person – a lost non-Christian – despite his affinity for a Christian culture.
The man’s fictional diary has – of course – been taken at face value by the news media as an accurate portrayal of his life and views. This is very convenient since it replaces the need for a real investigation. Nevertheless, the views it expresses were obviously drafted to colour all persons who oppose further world-integration as dangerous. Anybody espousing opposition to “multiculturalism” is perhaps a radical – a potential terrorist. I’m not smart enough to figure out why they don’t just stick to Moslem patsies – they are much more believable. In the US we had the alleged right-wing extremist bombing of the Federal Building in Oklahoma City by Timothy McVey – an event that is also well-documented to be a false-flag operation. This Anders Breivik appears to be his European counterpart. Obviously the reaction of sensible people is to disavow the criminal terrorist action. Thus creating a few right wing crazies helps marginalize anybody who gets to “fanatical” in their views. Such as, perhaps, anyone suggesting that all Moslems must be removed from Europe.
Nevertheless, it is an interesting question to confront: how do nations remain “Christian” – turning the other cheek and acting meek according to the Sermon on the Mount – while simultaneously dealing harshly to expel cultural threats by invading hoards of Moslem immigrants. It is an important question – and those that created the false-flag Norway terrorist have obviously sought to poison that discussion.
Bible believers don’t take their cues from how others have deceptively framed this church-state debate, but look for the answers by rightly dividing the Holy Scriptures.
Continued (2.20.12):
The brief answer to this dilemma is that that much of the “Sermon on the Mount” has no application to Christianity per se – it was to be Jesus Christ’s “Constitution” for his theocratic government had the Jews acknowledged him as their Messiah and King. They refused, crucified their Messiah, and rejected him.The doctrinal application of the Sermon on the Mount won’t return until Jesus Christ returns to set up his reign at the second advent.
Meanwhile, the spiritual blessing of Abraham in Christ was preached to the heathen – and Christianity was born.
True Christianity for the last 2,000 years has nothing to do with enthroning Jesus Christ as a world political ruler – although many have audaciously attempted to reign as if they were his proxies.
Rather, it is about the spiritual new-birth of individuals whose souls are saved by the power of the Holy Ghost when they repent of their sins and put their faith in the atoning sacrifice of Jesus Christ who died for their sins and rose again.
The function of New Testament Christianity is to get individuals saved – not to run governments. The primary source documents for the doctrines of Christian salvation lie in the Pauline epistles because it was to him that these matters were revealed.
The function of human government was not altered by St Paul’s message – he commanded that all persons submit in good conscience to the lawful authorities (“he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.” Romans 13:4), he did not oppose capital punishment (“if I be an offender, or have committed any thing worthy of death, I refuse not to die” Acts 25:11), and he recognized the maintenance of national divisions (“all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation” Acts 17:26).
The official religion of pagan Rome was changed to “Christianity” by Constantine around 313 AD – giving birth to the Roman Catholic religion. Soon thereafter the same authorities who had been killing Christians in the name of the Emperor, began killing non-Catholics in the name of the Pope.
In this unholy Church-State arrangement, “evangelizing” entailed converting rulers of nations to Catholicism, and then commanding them to kill all dissenters within their realm. Genuine Christians were murdered for failing to acknowledge the Catholics as their religious overlords.
The Catholic Church-state also annihilated great numbers of heathen “infidels” – and continues to do so. These murders – done by political fanatics as if in the name of Christ – have given Christianity a bad reputation. Of course, this is not unique because all theocratic governmental systems (Jewish, Muslim, Hindu – and Atheist) operate on the same principle – religious dissenters as treated as criminals who deserve punishment or death.
The superstitious fanaticism of the Dark Ages came to a close with the wide-spread publication and dissemination of pure Bible texts which triggered the Reformation period. The Catholic religion defended itself from falling into total oblivion at that time with a Jesuit inspired “counter-reformation” that unabashedly proclaimed the correctness of pagan tradition and instilled in their followers a deep-seated prejudice against Bible-truth by viciously anathematizing (cursing to hell) the true Christian freedom that the Reformation had brought to light.
The Jesuits were unable to get Protestant governments under their control – so the engaged in subversive activities designed to weaken their states from within – with the eventual aim of restoring a Romanist led government that will swear obedience to the Pontifix Maximus and genocide away all those that refuse to acknowledge him.
A stepping stone to accomplish this conflict is with Moslem hoards. Catholics are not opposed to using them for their purposes. For example, the Catholic Dictator Franco didn’t hesitate to use hundreds of thousands of them from Morocco as his invasion force against the “liberal” Catholics in Spain. After his fascist victory, Franco’s Islamic troops mysteriously “disappeared” – they were no longer needed.
The ignorant Moslem immigrants gathering in Europe today are pawns in a long and cynical campaign by the Jesuits for the ultimate victory of their pagan mystery religion, Romanism.
Because Europeans have turned away from the Bible-truth that sparked the Reformation – and embraced wickedness and infidelity – therefore God has allowed their countries to fall prey to many forms of national subversion: socialism, feminism, prostitution, sex-perversion, atheism, political black-mail, materialism, rock-music, drugs, et cetra. The plague of Moslem immigrants is yet another danger sign that cataclysm is near.
Instead of returning to God and back to the Bible, some right-wing types are ridiculously claiming that the Catholic Church is the answer.
That institution is meanwhile transforming – shedding its long pretense to Christianity and showing its long-standing true essence as the Babylonian Mystery Religion. In 313 AD it put Christianity under its tent – and will gladly do the same with Sufi Islam and Kabalah Judaism as sister rites – provided all agree to worship “the force” that deifies the man in Rome.
You were warned all about it in Bible prophecy.
===
Related articles
- Was Your Turkey Sacrificed to the Devil? (mackquigley.wordpress.com)
- What Really Happened in Norway (lewrockwell.com)
- Manufacturing a Patsy (infowars.com)
- Identical Police Drill (infowars.com)
- Called Police 10 times to surrender (infowars.com)
- Breivik’s Father in Special Forces (aangirfan.blogspot)
Posted on January 2