NAMI Noah’s Ark Reports (Developing)

Posted on December 23, 2011


New Noah’s Ark Press release today entitled, “Archaeologist Counters Critics Mount Ararat Discovery Is a Prehistoric Site.“

Dr. Klenck gives further confirmation of the NAMI Noah’s Ark find and states,

“The site is large, perhaps over one-hundred meters in length, at least two floors deep, and buried under as much as fifteen meters of stones and ice.” Klenck continues, “Parasut and his team did not build the features instead they removed ice and stones from previously excavated passages formed as late as the Bronze Age, as evidenced by a small bowl from this period, to access the site.”

Read in full here: sbwire.com/press-releases/print/119735

Mr. Philip William (araratdiscovery.com) recently issued an insightful analysis of the on-going controversy regarding the NAMI discovery and his own conclusions:

“Whatever doubts that NAMI had been guided to a recently fabricated site ended as those in attendance saw the video documenting the vast amount of wood, the various rooms, the obvious antiquity of the remains, and their similarity to the biblical description. On that day, it became clear to us that an important discovery had been made. ….

“At the same time, we must recognize that this discovery is not like that of the Dead Sea Scrolls, whose great significance was only gradually appreciated. The team making this discovery has already completed the careful and gradual steps that revealed this massive, ancient artificial structure. NAMI has also conducted a careful analysis of whether this might be some more ordinary structure such as a human settlement, a monastery, a church, some type of animal pen, or military post. Their analysis clearly rules out each of these alternative possibilities.”

William’s report appears on pages 11 to 19 of the following link (pdf):

http://www.noahsarkmovies.com/arkmovie/big5/pdf/response_full.pdf

English: Noah's Ark on Mount Ararat by Simon d...

The believability of the NAMI discovery is largely dependant upon the eyewitness testimony of the small number of explorers who have visited the site so far. The attacks against them have been largely based upon rumour and innuendo – those who assert the find has been “proven a hoax” are completely wrong. Doubts have been raised, but the discovery has not been disproved because it has not yet been thoroughly investigated by the scientific community.

Archaeologists should demand access to the location to study what is obviously a very intriguing discovery.

It is fascinating that several other Noah’s Ark reports are also surfacing at this time – yet none of which have the level of confirmation that the NAMI find already has. Why are those reports getting all the news attention? Is there a conspiracy to keep their discovery a secret?

The MackQuigley Report will keep you posted.

====

Related articles
Tagged: , , , , , ,
Posted in: Negative Thinking